Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19741491›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2009

Gamma-amino butyric acid type A receptor mutations at beta2N265 alter etomidate efficacy while preserving basal and agonist-dependent activity.

Rooma Desai, Dirk Ruesch, Stuart A Forman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. State-dependent energetics of GABABiophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Structural insights into GABANature communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of αβδ and αβγ GABAPharmacological research · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rooma DesaiDepartment of Anesthesia & Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Dirk Ruesch
Stuart A Forman
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Synthetic Chemistry CoreP01GM058448 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, KEITH W · 1999 to 2018
$33.6M
Volatile Anesthesia and the GABAA Receptor Gamma SubunitR01GM066724 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FORMAN, STUART A · 2003 to 2009
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM058448NIGMS NIH HHS P01GM58448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066724NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM66724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEtomidate acts at gamma-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors containing beta2 or beta3, but not beta1 subunits. Mutations at beta residue 265 (Ser in beta1; Asn in beta2 or beta3) profoundly affect etomidate sensitivity. Whether these mutations alter etomidate binding remains uncertain.

methodsHeterologously expressed alpha1beta2gamma2L GABAA receptors and receptors with beta2(N265S) or beta2(N265M) mutations were studied electrophysiologically in both Xenopus oocytes and HEK293 cells. Experiments quantified the impact of beta2N265 mutations or substituting beta1 for beta2 on basal channel activation, GABA EC50, maximal GABA efficacy, etomidate-induced leftward shift in GABA responses, etomidate direct activation, and rapid macrocurrent kinetics. Results were analyzed in the context of an established allosteric co-agonist mechanism.

resultsMutations produced only small changes in basal channel activity, GABA EC50, maximal GABA efficacy, and macrocurrent kinetics. Relative to wild-type, beta2(N265S) reduced etomidate enhancement of apparent GABA affinity six-fold, and it reduced etomidate direct activation efficacy 14-fold. beta2(N265M) totally eliminated both etomidate modulation of GABA responses and direct channel activation. Mechanism-based analysis showed that the function of both mutants remains consistent with the allosteric co-agonist model and that beta2(N265S) reduced etomidate allosteric efficacy five-fold, whereas etomidate-binding affinity dropped threefold. Experiments swapping beta2 subunits for beta1 indicated that etomidate efficacy is reduced 34-fold, whereas binding affinity drops less than two-fold.

conclusionsMutations at beta2N265 profoundly alter etomidate sensitivity with only small changes in basal and GABA-dependent channel activity. Mutations at the beta2N265 residue or replacement of beta2 with beta1 influence etomidate efficacy much more than binding to inactive receptors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCell LineCell MembraneData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA, ComplementaryElectrophysiologyEtomidateFemaleGABA AgonistsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMutationOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesReceptors, GABA-ADNA, ComplementaryEtomidateGABA AgonistsGABRB1 protein, humanGABRB2 protein, humanHypnotics and SedativesReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID19741491
PMCPMC2798018
OpenAlexW2017264248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.