Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19740416›Full record

ArticleChemistry Central journal2009

Finding one's way in proteomics: a protein species nomenclature.

Hartmut Schlüter, Rolf Apweiler, Hermann-Georg Holzhütter, Peter R Jungblut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. StageTip: a little giant unveiling the potential of mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Protein2Text: Resampling Mechanism to Translate Protein Sequences into Human-Interpretable Text.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quantitative Aspects of the Human Cell Proteome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Camouflaged angiogenic BMP-2 functions exposed by pico-paracrine biohybrids.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hartmut SchlüterUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. hschluet@uke.de
Rolf Apweiler
Hermann-Georg Holzhütter
Peter R Jungblut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of proteins has greatly improved in recent years, driven by new technologies in the fields of molecular biology and proteome research. It has become clear that from a single gene not only one single gene product but many different ones - termed protein species - are generated, all of which may be associated with different functions. Nonetheless, an unambiguous nomenclature for describing individual protein species is still lacking. With the present paper we therefore propose a systematic nomenclature for the comprehensive description of protein species. The protein species nomenclature is flexible and adaptable to every level of knowledge and of experimental data in accordance with the exact chemical composition of individual protein species. As a minimum description the entry name (gene name + species according to the UniProt knowledgebase) can be used, if no analytical data about the target protein species are available.

Identifiers

PMID19740416
PMCPMC2758878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.