Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19738421›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2009

Temporal differences in DNA replication during the S phase using single fiber analysis of normal human fibroblasts and glioblastoma T98G cells.

Rebecca A Frum, Zakaria S Khondker, David G Kaufman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genomic methods for measuring DNA replication dynamics.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. DNA replication timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Initiation of DNA Replication in the Human Genome.Hereditary genetics : current research · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Abasic sites preferentially form at regions undergoing DNA replication.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca A FrumDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Zakaria S Khondker
David G Kaufman
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University · RUUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

ENVIRONMENTAL PATHOLOGYT32ES007017 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAUFMAN, DAVID G. · 1985 to 2011
$5.1M
CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY AND S PHASE INITIATION SITESR01CA084493 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAUFMAN, DAVID G. · 2000 to 2009
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084493NCI NIH HHS R01-CA084493NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007017NIEHS NIH HHS T32-ES07017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently shown that replication forks pause near origins in normal human fibroblasts (NHF1-hTERT) but not glioblastoma T98G cells. This observation led us to question whether other differences in the replication program may exist between these cell types that may relate to their genetic integrity. To identify differences, we detected immunoflourescently the sequential incorporation of the nucleotide analogs IdU and CldU into replicating DNA at the start of every hour of a synchronized S phase. We then characterized the patterns of labeled replicating DNA tracks and quantified the percentages and lengths of the tracks found at these hourly intervals. From the directionality of labeling in single extended replicating DNA fibers, tracks were categorized as single bidirectional origins, unidirectional elongations, clusters of origins firing in tandem, or merging forks (terminations). Our analysis showed that the start of S phase is enriched in single bidirectional origins in NHF1-hTERT cells, followed by an increase in clustering during mid S phase and an increase in merging forks during late S phase. Early S phase in T98G cells also largely consisted of single bidirectional origin initiations; however, an increase in clustering was delayed until an hour later, and clusters were shorter in mid/late S phase than in NHF1-hTERT cells. The spike in merging forks also did not occur until an hour later in T98G cells. Our observations suggest models to explain the temporal replication of single and clustered origins, and suggest differences in the replication program in a normal and cancer cell line.

Indexed as

AphidicolinCell Line, TumorDNADNA ReplicationFibroblastsGlioblastomaHumansIdoxuridineModels, BiologicalReplication OriginS PhaseTime FactorsAphidicolinDNAIdoxuridine

Identifiers

PMID19738421
PMCPMC2829940
OpenAlexW2066821598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.