Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19738017›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Alcohols for skin antisepsis at clinically relevant skin sites.

Mirja Reichel, Peter Heisig, Thomas Kohlmann, Günter Kampf

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03551561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antisepsis Techniques in Orthopedic Surgical Procedures: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do Vale do SapucaiRan2017 to 2017Enrolled170ConditionsInfectionArmsCSAAC, CSAC
NCT05896462 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Skin Antisepsis After Primary Skin Closure on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection After Abdominal Surgery for Sepsis: a Preliminary Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIkechukwu Bartholomew UlasiRan2019 to 2022Enrolled37ConditionsAntisepsisArms10% povidone iodine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microbial Load in Septic and Aseptic Procedure Rooms.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Sepsis, parenteral vaccination and skin disinfection.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mirja ReichelBode Chemie GmbH, Scientific Affairs, Melanchthonstr. 27, 22525 Hamburg, Germany. mirja.reichel@bode-chemie.de
Peter Heisig
Thomas Kohlmann
Günter Kampf
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antiseptic efficacy of ethanol, isopropanol, and n-propanol at 60%, 70%, and 89.5% (all vol/vol) was analyzed after 2, 3, or 4 min of application to the forehead, back, and abdomen of 180 volunteers by the use of a standardized swab sampling method. Results of recolonization by the aerobic skin flora of the upper arms and backs of 20 volunteers were compared 72 h after treatment with 0.5%, 1%, or 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) in 89.5% n-propanol. The most effective alcohol at all skin sites was n-propanol, with a mean log(10) reduction of 1.82 after 2 min on the forehead. Efficacy against the aerobic flora of the forehead was mainly influenced by the type of alcohol (P < 0.001), followed by the concentration (P < 0.001) and the application time (P = 0.006). Ethanol and isopropanol were significantly less effective (both P < 0.001). Alcohol supplemented with 0.5% or more CHG was significantly more effective than alcohol alone in the suppression of recolonization (P < 0.05). An 89.5% solution of n-propanol was the most effective alcohol for the reduction of populations of aerobic skin flora. Its combination with CHG is appropriate whenever recolonization of the skin must be limited. Further studies are needed to determine the most effective concentration of CHG in n-propanol to provide the best protection against recolonization of the skin, e.g., for catheter site care.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineColony Count, MicrobialDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSkinAlcoholsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconate

Identifiers

PMID19738017
PMCPMC2772323
OpenAlexW2110616718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.