ReviewPhysiological genomics2009
Translational informatics: enabling high-throughput research paradigms.
Review in Physiological genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognition and behavior in neurofibromatosis type 1: report and perspective from the Cognition and Behavior in NF1 (CABIN) Task Force.Genes & development · 2025Article
- Translational Informatics Driven Drug Repositioning for Neurodegenerative Disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Predictive Modeling for Clinical Features Associated With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Impulsive and Omission Errors: Potential Temporal Processing Endophenotypes in ADHD.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Research Integrated Network of Systems (RINS): a virtual data warehouse for the acceleration of translational research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Coverage of the HL7AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Article
- Research IT maturity models for academic health centers: Early development and initial evaluation.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- DISCOVERY OF MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPIES.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2016Article
- Research Infrastructure for Collaborative Team Science: Challenges in Technology-Supported Workflows in and Across Laboratories, Institutions, and Geographies.Seminars in nephrology · 2015Review
- MicroRNA signatures as biomarkers and therapeutic target for CNS embryonal tumors: the pros and the cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- Geographic health information systems: a platform to support the 'triple aim'.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2013Article
- People, organizational, and leadership factors impacting informatics support for clinical and translational research.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Article
- Missing signposts on the roadmap to quality: a call to improve medication adherence indicators in data collection for population research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2013Article
- Towards a "4I" approach to personalized healthcare.Clinical and translational medicine · 2012Article
- Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2012Article
- Computational challenges and human factors influencing the design and use of clinical research participant eligibility pre-screening tools.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Article
- Program in pharmacogenomics at the Ohio State University Medical Center.Pharmacogenomics · 2012Article
- Research-IQ: development and evaluation of an ontology-anchored integrative query tool.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2011Article
- A cognitive task analysis of a visual analytic workflow: Exploring molecular interaction networks in systems biology.Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration · 2011Article
- Multi-dimensional discovery of biomarker and phenotype complexes.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common thread throughout the clinical and translational research domains is the need to collect, manage, integrate, analyze, and disseminate large-scale, heterogeneous biomedical data sets. However, well-established and broadly adopted theoretical and practical frameworks and models intended to address such needs are conspicuously absent in the published literature or other reputable knowledge sources. Instead, the development and execution of multidisciplinary, clinical, or translational studies are significantly limited by the propagation of "silos" of both data and expertise. Motivated by this fundamental challenge, we report upon the current state and evolution of biomedical informatics as it pertains to the conduct of high-throughput clinical and translational research and will present both a conceptual and practical framework for the design and execution of informatics-enabled studies. The objective of presenting such findings and constructs is to provide the clinical and translational research community with a common frame of reference for discussing and expanding upon such models and methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.