Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19737902›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2009

The O antigen is a critical antigen for the development of a protective immune response to Bordetella parapertussis.

Xuqing Zhang, Elizabeth M Goebel, Maria Eugenia Rodríguez, Andrew Preston, Eric T Harvill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss of O-antigen due toScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Xuqing ZhangDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 115 Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Elizabeth M Goebel
Maria Eugenia Rodríguez
Andrew Preston
Eric T Harvill
Pennsylvania State University · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Evolution of the Bordetellae from Commensals to PathogensR01GM083113 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HARVILL, ERIC T · 2008 to 2011
$2.1M
Comparative Immunobiology of the bordetellaeR01AI053075 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI HARVILL, ERIC T. · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI053075NIGMS NIH HHS GM083113NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite excellent vaccine coverage in developed countries, whooping cough is a reemerging disease that can be caused by two closely related pathogens, Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis. The two are antigenically distinct, and current vaccines, containing only B. pertussis-derived antigens, confer efficient protection against B. pertussis but not against B. parapertussis. B. pertussis does not express the O antigen, while B. parapertussis retains it as a dominant surface antigen. Since the O antigen is a protective antigen for many pathogenic bacteria, we examined whether this factor is a potential protective antigen for B. parapertussis. In a mouse model of infection, immunization with wild-type B. parapertussis elicited a strong antibody response to the O antigen and conferred efficient protection against a subsequent B. parapertussis challenge. However, immunization with an isogenic mutant lacking the O antigen, B. parapertussis Deltawbm, induced antibodies that recognized other antigens but did not efficiently mediate opsonophagocytosis of B. parapertussis. The passive transfer of sera raised against B. parapertussis, but not B. parapertussis Deltawbm, reduced B. parapertussis loads in the lower respiratory tracts of mice. The addition of 10 microg of purified B. parapertussis lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which contains the O antigen, but not B. parapertussis Deltawbm LPS drastically improved the efficacy of the acellular vaccine Adacel against B. parapertussis. These data suggest that the O antigen is a critical protective antigen of B. parapertussis and its inclusion can substantially improve whooping cough vaccine efficacy against this pathogen.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesBlotting, WesternBordetella InfectionsBordetella parapertussisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayMiceMice, Inbred C57BLO AntigensAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesO Antigens

Identifiers

PMID19737902
PMCPMC2772536
OpenAlexW2167684549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.