Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19737426›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2009

Assessment of perinatal outcome after sustained tocolysis in early labour (APOSTEL-II trial).

Carolien Roos, Liesbeth Hcj Scheepers, Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp, Annemiek Bolte, Jerome Cornette, Jan B Derks, Hans Jj Duvekot, Jim van Eyck, Joke H Kok, Anneke Kwee and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Carolien RoosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. C.Roos@obgyn.umcn.nl
Liesbeth Hcj Scheepers
Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp
Annemiek Bolte
Jerome Cornette
Jan B Derks
Hans Jj Duvekot
Jim van Eyck
Joke H Kok
Anneke Kwee
Ashley Merién
Brent C Opmeer
Mariëlle G van Pampus
Dimitri Nm Papatsonis
Martina M Porath
Joris Am van der Post
Sicco A Scherjon
Krystyne Sollie
Marc Ea Spaanderman
Sylvia Mc Vijgen
Christine Willekes
Ben Willem J Mol
Fred K Lotgering
Academic Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLIsala · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm labour is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in the Western world. At present, there is evidence that tocolysis for 48 hours is useful in women with threatened preterm labour at least before 32 weeks. This allows transfer of the patient to a perinatal centre, and maximizes the effect of corticosteroids for improved neonatal survival. It is questionable whether treatment with tocolytics should be maintained after 48 hours. METHODS/

designThe APOSTEL II trial is a multicentre placebo-controlled study. Pregnant women admitted for threatened preterm labour who have been treated with 48 hours corticosteroids and tocolysis will be eligible to participate in the trial between 26+0 and 32+2 weeks gestational age. They will be randomly allocated to nifedipine (intervention) or placebo (control) for twelve days or until delivery, whatever comes first.Primary outcome is a composite of perinatal death, and severe neonatal morbidity up to evaluation at 6 months after birth. Secondary outcomes are gestational age at delivery, number of days in neonatal intensive care and total days of the first 6 months out of hospital. In addition a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. Analysis will be by intention to treat. The power calculation is based on an expected 11% difference in adverse neonatal outcome. This implies that 406 women have to be randomised (two sided test, beta 0.2 at alpha 0.05). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence as to whether maintenance tocolysis reduces severe perinatal morbidity and mortality in women with threatened preterm labour before 32 weeks.

trial registrationCLINICAL

trial registrationhttp://www.trialregister.nl, NTR 1336, date of registration: June 3rd 2008.

Indexed as

Cervical Length MeasurementClinical ProtocolsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFibronectinsGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornNifedipineObstetric Labor, PrematureOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyResearch DesignTocolysisTocolytic AgentsFibronectinsNifedipineTocolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19737426
PMCPMC2754432
OpenAlexW2130128941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.