ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2009
Imaging myocardial angiogenesis.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03350737 (Coronary ARteriogenesis With Combined Heparin and EXercise Therapy in Chronic Refractory Angina), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Coronary ARteriogenesis With Combined Heparin and EXercise Therapy in Chronic Refractory Angina
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of collateral artery research.Current cardiology reviews · 2014Review
- Assessment of coronary microvascular resistance in the chronic infarcted pig heart.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2013Article
- Angiogenic therapy for cardiac repair based on protein delivery systems.Heart failure reviews · 2012Review
- Myocardial therapeutic angiogenesis: a review of the state of development and future obstacles.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2011Review
- Cardiovascular molecular imaging: focus on clinical translation.Circulation · 2011Review
- Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Pretreated With Ischemic Rat Heart Extracts Promote Angiogenesis via the Delivery of DMBT1.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging myocardial angiogenesis presents a major technical challenge because the ideal spatial resolution required is substantially higher than that available with standard X-ray angiography and nuclear medicine imaging. Moreover, these clinical imaging methods are currently inadequate (because of insufficient resolution) for clinical trials of angiogenic agents for the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Specialized techniques in MRI, ultrasonography, echocardiography and CT that are under development might provide improved means of imaging myocardial angiogenesis. Molecular imaging technologies are also being developed to improve resolution and to provide a better mechanistic insight into angiogenic therapies for ischemic heart diseases. This Review examines advanced methods for imaging angiogenesis. These technologies might soon permit data to be obtained directly from scientific studies and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19736553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.