Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19735873›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2009

A gene expression model of intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity: prediction of response and prognosis after chemoradiation.

Steven A Eschrich, Jimmy Pramana, Hongling Zhang, Haiyan Zhao, David Boulware, Ji-Hyun Lee, Gregory Bloom, Caio Rocha-Lima, Scott Kelley, Douglas P Calvin and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiation Oncology-Biology Integration Network: Bridging the Gap between Biological Research and Clinical Practice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Differentiation Stage Predicts Radiosensitivity in Mesenchymal-Like Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Steven A EschrichH Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jimmy Pramana
Hongling Zhang
Haiyan Zhao
David Boulware
Ji-Hyun Lee
Gregory Bloom
Caio Rocha-Lima
Scott Kelley
Douglas P Calvin
Timothy J Yeatman
Adrian C Begg
Javier F Torres-Roca

Funding

Molecular Profiling to Predict Response to ChemotherapyR21CA101355 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI YEATMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2003 to 2004
$725k
Prediction of Radiation Response With A Novel ClassifierK08CA108926 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI TORRES-ROCA, JAVIER F · 2004 to 2008
$657k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA108926NCI NIH HHS K08 CA 108926-05NCI NIH HHS R21 CA101355NCI NIH HHS R21CA101355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelopment of a radiosensitivity predictive assay is a central goal of radiation oncology. We reasoned a gene expression model could be developed to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity and treatment response in patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiosensitivity (determined by survival fraction at 2 Gy) was modeled as a function of gene expression, tissue of origin, ras status (mut/wt), and p53 status (mut/wt) in 48 human cancer cell lines. Ten genes were identified and used to build a rank-based linear regression algorithm to predict an intrinsic radiosensitivity index (RSI, high index = radioresistance). This model was applied to three independent cohorts treated with concurrent chemoradiation: head-and-neck cancer (HNC, n = 92); rectal cancer (n = 14); and esophageal cancer (n = 12).

resultsPredicted RSI was significantly different in responders (R) vs. nonresponders (NR) in the rectal (RSI R vs. NR 0.32 vs. 0.46, p = 0.03), esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.37 vs. 0.50, p = 0.05) and combined rectal/esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.34 vs. 0.48, p = 0.001511) cohorts. Using a threshold RSI of 0.46, the model has a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82%, and positive predictive value of 86%. Finally, we evaluated the model as a prognostic marker in HNC. There was an improved 2-year locoregional control (LRC) in the predicted radiosensitive group (2-year LRC 86% vs. 61%, p = 0.05).

conclusionsWe validate a robust multigene expression model of intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity in three independent cohorts totaling 118 patients. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a systems biology-based radiosensitivity model is validated in multiple independent clinical datasets.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsModels, GeneticRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsTopotecan

Identifiers

PMID19735873
PMCPMC3038688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.