Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19735549›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2009

An intraductal human-in-mouse transplantation model mimics the subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Fariba Behbod, Frances S Kittrell, Heather LaMarca, David Edwards, Sofia Kerbawy, Jessica C Heestand, Evelin Young, Purna Mukhopadhyay, Hung-Wen Yeh, D Craig Allred and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PARP-1 as a novel target in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Hormone Signaling in Breast Development and Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fariba BehbodDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. fbehbod@kumc.edu
Frances S Kittrell
Heather LaMarca
David Edwards
Sofia Kerbawy
Jessica C Heestand
Evelin Young
Purna Mukhopadhyay
Hung-Wen Yeh
D Craig Allred
Min Hu
Kornelia Polyak
Jeffrey M Rosen
Daniel Medina
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USHarvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Role of Cancer Stem Cells in Malignant Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.R00CA127462 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEHBOD, FARIBA · 2009 to 2011
$740k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA127462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHuman models of noninvasive breast tumors are limited, and the existing in vivo models do not mimic inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common type (80%) of noninvasive breast lesions. The aim of this study was to develop an in vivo model whereby the natural progression of human DCIS might be reproduced and studied. To accomplish this goal, the intraductal human-in-mouse (HIM) transplantation model was developed. The resulting models, which mimicked some of the diversity of human noninvasive breast cancers in vivo, were used to show whether subtypes of human DCIS might contain distinct subpopulations of tumor-initiating cells.

methodsThe intraductal models were established by injection of human DCIS cell lines (MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM-225), as well as cells derived from a primary human DCIS (FSK-H7), directly into the primary mouse mammary ducts via cleaved nipple. Six to eight weeks after injections, whole-mount, hematoxylin and eosin, and immunofluorescence staining were performed to evaluate the type and extent of growth of the DCIS-like lesions. To identify tumor-initiating cells, putative human breast stem/progenitor subpopulations were sorted from MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM-225 with flow cytometry, and their in vivo growth fractions were compared with the Fisher's Exact test.

resultsHuman DCIS cells initially grew within the mammary ducts, followed by progression to invasion in some cases into the stroma. The lesions were histologically almost identical to those of clinical human DCIS. This method was successful for growing DCIS cell lines (MCF10DCIS.COM and SUM-225) as well as a primary human DCIS (FSK-H7). MCF10DCIS.COM represented a basal-like DCIS model, whereas SUM-225 and FSK-H7 cells were models for HER-2+ DCIS. With this approach, we showed that various subtypes of human DCIS appeared to contain distinct subpopulations of tumor-initiating cells.

conclusionsThe intraductal HIM transplantation model provides an invaluable tool that mimics human breast heterogeneity at the noninvasive stages and allows the study of the distinct molecular and cellular mechanisms of breast cancer progression.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, DuctalCarcinoma in SituCell Growth ProcessesCell Line, TumorFemaleFlow CytometryHumansMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasm TransplantationTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID19735549
PMCPMC2790841
OpenAlexW2097381426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.