Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19734402›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

The use of electronic health records in the exam room and patient satisfaction: a systematic review.

Jihad S Irani, Jennifer L Middleton, Ruta Marfatia, Evelyn T Omana, Frank D'Amico

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Provider and patient satisfaction with the integration of ambulatory and hospital EHR systems.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jihad S IraniFaculty of Health Sciences and the Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon. jihad.irani@balamand.edu.lb
Jennifer L Middleton
Ruta Marfatia
Evelyn T Omana
Frank D'Amico

Funding

PHS HHS ID55HPO5162-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians may hesitate to implement electronic health record (EHR) systems because they fear a decrease in patient satisfaction. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether physician EHR use in the patient room affects patient satisfaction.

methodsWe searched the literature using MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Proceedings First, and ProQuest Digital Dissertations. Our inclusion criteria were a description of physician EHR use in the examination room, EHR use in an outpatient setting, setting in the United States, publication year no earlier than 2000, and measurement of patient satisfaction. We included both qualitative and quantitative research. We included 7 articles in the final analysis: 3 cross-sectional, and 4 pre-design and post-design.

resultsSeveral studies had methodological concerns. Six studies found that physician EHR use had either a positive or neutral effect on patient satisfaction. One study found a negative effect on the physicians' perception of patient satisfaction. The reported statistical results from these studies were not homogenous enough for meta-analysis.

conclusionStudies examining physician EHR use have found mostly neutral or positive effects on patient satisfaction, but primary care researchers need to conduct further research for a more definitive answer.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPhysical ExaminationAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.