Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19733728›Full record

ReviewAnalytica chimica acta2009

Recent trends in microdialysis sampling integrated with conventional and microanalytical systems for monitoring biological events: a review.

Pradyot Nandi, Susan M Lunte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytica chimica acta, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Experimental Methods for Investigating Uptake 2 Processes In Vivo.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microfabricated Probes for Studying Brain Chemistry: A Review.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pradyot NandiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047, United States.
Susan M Lunte

Funding

Analytical Methods for Investigating Peptide TransportR01NS042929 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LUNTE, SUSAN M · 2002 to 2011
$2.3M
Analytical Methods for Investigating Peptide TransportR56NS042929 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LUNTE, SUSAN M · 2007 to 2007
$351k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042929NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042929-04NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS042929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microdialysis (MD) is a sampling technique that can be employed to monitor biological events both in vivo and in vitro. When it is coupled to an analytical system, microdialysis can provide near real-time information on the time-dependent concentration changes of analytes in the extracellular space or other aqueous environments. Online systems for the analysis of microdialysis samples enable fast, selective and sensitive analysis while preserving the temporal information. Analytical methods employed for online analysis include liquid chromatography (LC), capillary (CE) and microchip electrophoresis and flow-through biosensor devices. This review article provides an overview of microdialysis sampling and online analysis systems with emphasis on in vivo analysis. Factors that affect the frequency of analysis and, hence, the temporal resolution of these systems are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosensing TechniquesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidElectrophoresis, CapillaryMicrochip Analytical ProceduresMicrodialysisOnline SystemsRats

Identifiers

PMID19733728
PMCPMC3744124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.