Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19733596›Full record

ReviewAntiviral research2009

Wanted, dead or alive: new viral vaccines.

Ian J Amanna, Mark K Slifka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antiviral research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Principles and Challenges in anti-COVID-19 Vaccine Development.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Is it dead or alive? TLR8 can tell.Nature immunology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian J AmannaNajít Technologies, Inc., Suite 200, Portland, OR 97201, USA. iamanna@najittech.com
Mark K Slifka
Najít Technologies (United States) · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

YR 50 PROJ- ROBERTS PRIMATE ISLETP51RR000163 · NCRR · OREGON REGIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER · PI FRUH, KLAUS J · 1985 to 2011
$140.8M
The Burden of Chikungunya and Dengue Infection in KenyaU54AI081680 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI AXTHELM, MICHAEL K · 2009 to 2013
$40.4M
Development of a Safe and Effective Vaccine Against West Nile VirusU01AI082196 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2009 to 2012
$7.1M
Development of a Yellow Fever Vaccine for Vulnerable PopulationR44AI079898 · NIAID · NAJIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI AMANNA, IAN JAMES, SLIFKA, MARK K · 2011 to 2020
$6.2M
Development of a Yellow Fever Vaccine for Vulnerable PopulationsR43AI079898 · NIAID · NAJIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI AMANNA, IAN JAMES, SLIFKA, MARK K · 2008 to 2009
$585k
REPRODUCTIVE STEROIDS AND EXPERIMENTAL STROKEK01RR000163 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, STEPHANIE J · 2000 to 2004
$479k
Vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell memoryR56AI076506 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2008 to 2008
$308k
NCRR NIH HHS K01 RR000163NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000163NCRR NIH HHS RR000163NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI079898NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI076506NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082196NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI081680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the most effective methods used for protecting the public against infectious disease. Vaccines can be segregated into two general categories: replicating vaccines (i.e., live, attenuated vaccines) and non-replicating vaccines (e.g., inactivated or subunit vaccines). It has been assumed that live attenuated vaccines are superior to non-replicating vaccines in terms of the quality of the antiviral immune response, the level of protective immunity, and the duration of protective immunity. Although this a prevalent viewpoint within the field, there are several exceptions to the rule. Here, we will explore the historical literature in which some of these conclusions have been based, including "Experiments of Nature" and describe examples of the efficacy of replicating vaccines compared to their non-replicating counterparts. By building a better understanding of how successful vaccines work, we hope to develop better "next-generation" vaccines as well as new vaccines against HIV--a pathogen of global importance for which no licensed vaccine currently exists.

Indexed as

Viral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDrug DesignHumansImmunologic MemoryT-LymphocytesVaccines, AttenuatedVirus DiseasesVirusesVirus ReplicationAntibodies, ViralVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19733596
PMCPMC2760379
OpenAlexW2028722585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.