ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2009
FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- FOXO transcription factors in Alzheimer's Disease: balancing neuroprotection and neuronal degeneration.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Disrupting FOXO4 function confers neuroprotection against oxidative stress and ischemia-reperfusion-caused neuronal injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The future of Forkhead box O transcription factors.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- Review
- FOXOs and their roles in acute and chronic neurological disorders.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Daidzein improves muscle atrophy caused by lovastatin by regulating the AMPK/FOXO3a axis.Chinese medicine · 2024Article
- Forkhead box O proteins: steering the course of stem cell fate.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024Review
- Article
- Regulation of mitochondrial function by FOXOs in ischemic stroke and Alzheimer's disease.Organelle (Tucson, Ariz.) · 2024Article
- FOXO family isoforms.Cell death & disease · 2023Review
- Adaptive evolution and co-evolution of chloroplast genomes in Pteridaceae species occupying different habitats: overlapping residues are always highly mutated.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- FOXO inBiology · 2023Article
- FOXOs: masters of the equilibrium.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- Amphioxus muscle transcriptomes reveal vertebrate-like myoblast fusion genes and a highly conserved role of insulin signalling in the metabolism of muscle.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- MAP4K3/GLK inhibits Treg differentiation by direct phosphorylating IKKβ and inducing IKKβ-mediated FoxO1 nuclear export and Foxp3 downregulation.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Functional conservation in genes and pathways linking ageing and immunity.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2021Review
- Review
- Fatty liver diseases, mechanisms, and potential therapeutic plant medicines.Chinese journal of natural medicines · 2020Review
- Foxo transcription factors in T cell biology and tumor immunity.Seminars in cancer biology · 2018Review
- The Calcineurin-FoxO-MuRF1 signaling pathway regulates myofibril integrity in cardiomyocytes.eLife · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForkhead box, class O (FoxO) belongs to the large family of forkhead transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved forkhead box DNA-binding domain. To date, the FoxO group has four mammalian members: FoxO1, FoxO3a, FoxO4 and FoxO6, which are orthologs of DAF16, an insulin-responsive transcription factor involved in regulating longevity of worms and flies. The degree of homology between these four members is high, especially in the forkhead domain, which contains the DNA-binding interface. Yet, mouse FoxO knockouts have revealed that each FoxO gene has its unique role in the physiological process. Whether the functional divergences are primarily due to adaptive selection pressure or relaxed selective constraint remains an open question. As such, this study aims to address the evolutionary mode of FoxO, which may lead to the functional divergence.
resultsSequence similarity searches have performed in genome and scaffold data to identify homologues of FoxO in vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis was used to characterize the family evolutionary history by identifying two duplications early in vertebrate evolution. To determine the mode of evolution in vertebrates, we performed a rigorous statistical analysis with FoxO gene sequences, including relative rate ratio tests, branch-specific dN/dS ratio tests, site-specific dN/dS ratio tests, branch-site dN/dS ratio tests and clade level amino acid conservation/variation patterns analysis. Our results suggest that FoxO is constrained by strong purifying selection except four sites in FoxO6, which have undergone positive Darwinian selection. The functional divergence in this family is best explained by either relaxed purifying selection or positive selection.
conclusionWe present a phylogeny describing the evolutionary history of the FoxO gene family and show that the genes have evolved through duplications followed by purifying selection except for four sites in FoxO6 fixed by positive selection lie mostly within the non-conserved optimal PKB motif in the C-terminal part. Relaxed selection may play important roles in the process of functional differentiation evolved through gene duplications as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.