Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19732060›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2009

Disrupting specific PDZ domain-mediated interactions for therapeutic benefit.

Miles D Houslay

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Miles D HouslayNeuroscience and Molecular Pharmacology, Faculty of Biomedical & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. M.Houslay@bio.gla.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades have seen an immense increase in our appreciation of the vast range of signalling processes and supporting machinery that occur in cells. Pivotal to this is the notion of signal compartmentalization (compartmentation). Targeting by protein domains is critical in allowing signalling complexes to be assembled at defined intracellular locales so as to confer correct function. This issue of the BJP contains two intriguing articles that address functional protein-protein interactions involving PDZ domains [Post-synaptic density protein-95 (PSD95), Drosophila disc large tumour suppressor (DlgA) and Zonula occludens-1 protein (zo-1)] and their implications for signalling. One involves targeting of neuronal nitric oxide synthase to the N-methyl D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor via the PDZ-containing signal scaffold, PSD95. The other involves controlling multiple receptor inputs into regulation of epithelial Na(+)K(+)-ATPase through the PDZ-containing signal scaffold Pals-associated tight junction. Highlighted is not only the use of dominant-negative strategies to identify the importance of targeting at specific types of PDZ domains but also the exciting notion that small molecule disruptors of interaction at specific PDZ domains can be generated for potential therapeutic application.

Indexed as

PDZ DomainsDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IProtein BindingReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSignal TransductionSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinDLG4 protein, humanDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IPATJ protein, DrosophilaReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase

Identifiers

PMID19732060
PMCPMC2757687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.