Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19731375›Full record

ArticleProteins2010

Modeling the possible conformations of the extracellular loops in G-protein-coupled receptors.

Gregory V Nikiforovich, Christina M Taylor, Garland R Marshall, Thomas J Baranski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Difference between restoring and predicting 3D structures of the loops in G-protein-coupled receptors by molecular modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  10. Successful prediction of the intra- and extracellular loops of four G-protein-coupled receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory V NikiforovichMolLife Design LLC, St. Louis, Missouri 63141, USA. gnikiforovich@gmail.com
Christina M Taylor
Garland R Marshall
Thomas J Baranski
Washington University in St. Louis · USUnion des Industries Ferroviaires Européennes · BE

Funding

Role of Receptor Dimerization in G Protein ActivationR01GM063720 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARANSKI, THOMAS JOHN · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
G Protein Activation Mechanisms by Hormone ReceptorsR01GM071634 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARANSKI, THOMAS JOHN · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Understanding Molecular Recognition at the Rhodopsin/Transducin InterfaceF32GM082200 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, CHRISTINA MARIE · 2007 to 2009
$76k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM082200NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM082200NIGMS NIH HHS GM63720NIGMS NIH HHS GM 71634NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063720NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the results of a de novo approach modeling possible conformational dynamics of the extracellular (EC) loops in G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), specifically in bovine rhodopsin (bRh), squid rhodopsin (sRh), human beta-2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR), turkey beta-1 adrenergic receptor (beta1AR), and human A2 adenosine receptor (A2AR). The approach deliberately sacrificed a detailed description of any particular 3D structure of the loops in GPCRs in favor of a less precise description of many possible structures. Despite this, the approach found ensembles of the low-energy conformers of the EC loops that contained structures close to the available X-ray snapshots. For the smaller EC1 and EC3 loops (6-11 residues), our results were comparable with the best recent results obtained by other authors using much more sophisticated techniques. For the larger EC2 loops (25-34 residues), our results consistently yielded structures significantly closer to the X-ray snapshots than the results of the other authors for loops of similar size. The results suggested possible large-scale movements of the EC loops in GPCRs that might determine their conformational dynamics. The approach was also validated by accurately reproducing the docking poses for low-molecular-weight ligands in beta2AR, beta1AR, and A2AR, demonstrating the possible influence of the conformations of the EC loops on the binding sites of ligands. The approach correctly predicted the system of disulfide bridges between the EC loops in A2AR and elucidated the probable pathways for forming this system.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCattleCrystallography, X-RayDecapodiformesHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Adenosine A2Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledLigandsReceptors, Adenosine A2Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID19731375
PMCPMC2795062
OpenAlexW2070557084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.