Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19730843›Full record

ArticleUrological research2009

Proteomic analysis of a matrix stone: a case report.

Benjamin K Canales, Lorraine Anderson, LeeAnn Higgins, Chris Frethem, Alice Ressler, Il Won Kim, Manoj Monga

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urological research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Case of Pure Matrix Ureteral Stone: A rare type of urinarySultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Matrix stone in ureter and bladder simultaneously.Japanese journal of radiology · 2012
    Article
  11. Mass spectrometry and renal calculi.Journal of medicine and life
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin K CanalesDepartment of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Benjamin.canales@urology.ufl.edu
Lorraine Anderson
LeeAnn Higgins
Chris Frethem
Alice Ressler
Il Won Kim
Manoj Monga
University of Minnesota · USPhysical Sciences (United States) · USSoongsil University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matrix stones are radiolucent bodies that present as soft muco-proteinaceous material within the renal collecting system. Following wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we homogenized a surgically removed matrix stone, extracted and purified protein, and analyzed samples using tandem mass spectrometry for proteomic composition. Resulting spectra were searched using ProteinPilot 2.0, and identified proteins were reported with >95% confidence. Primary XRD mineral analysis was a biological apatite, and SEM revealed fibrous, net-like laminations containing bacterial, cellular, and crystalline material. Of the 33 unique proteins identified, 90% have not been previously reported within matrix stones and over 70% may be considered inflammatory or defensive in nature. Characterization of other matrix stone proteomes, in particular from non-infectious populations, may yield insights into the pathogenesis of this rare stone as well as the mineralogical process that occurs within crystalline calculi.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdultApatitesFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMineralsNephrolithiasisProteus mirabilisUrinary Tract InfectionsX-Ray DiffractionApatitesMinerals

Identifiers

PMID19730843
OpenAlexW2011761425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.