Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19730718›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2009

Infective endocarditis--prophylaxis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment.

Nadja Westphal, Björn Plicht, Christoph Naber

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of patients with risk factors.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dentigenous infectious foci - a risk factor of infective endocarditis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadja WestphalKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Elisabeth-Krankhaus, Essen, Germany.
Björn Plicht
Christoph Naber
Essen University Hospital · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite important medical advances, infective endocarditis (IE) is still a disease with high morbidity and mortality. Its prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment are still a major challenge in clinical practice.

methodsSelective literature review based on the current German and European guidelines and a PubMed search from 2004 onward.

resultsEssential requirements for the rapid diagnosis and specific treatment of IE are the echocardiographic demonstration of endocardial disease and the identification of the causative organism by blood culture. The modified Duke criteria have made the diagnosis more objective but are not a replacement for clinical judgement. It should be borne in mind, when the initial empirical treatment is chosen, that Staphylococcus aureus is currently the most common causative organism. If diagnostic criteria are met that suggest a methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection, then glycopeptide antibiotics are still the standard treatment. Newer agents such as daptomycin can be considered as an alternative, as suggested by recent studies and in view of the increasing frequency of impaired vancomycin susceptibility. Early surgical treatment should be considered for patients who are likely to encounter further complications along their clinical course. According to the current recommendations, antibiotics should be given for endocarditis prophylaxis only to patients about to undergo one of a small number of explicitly defined procedures, who would otherwise be at a high risk of major illness or death. The purpose of this restriction is to make prophylaxis more efficient.

conclusionIE remains a potentially lethal infectious disease that can be treated effectively only by physicians from multiple disciplines working in collaboration.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEchocardiographyEndocarditisHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic therapyblood cultureDuke criteriainfective endocarditissurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID19730718
PMCPMC2735718
OpenAlexW2132539679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.