Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2009
Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.
Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00887120 (Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Low- or Standard-dose of Lopinavir/Ritonavir), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Low- or Standard-dose of Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra®) in PI-naïve HIV-1 Infected Children
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thirteen-year viral suppression and immunologic recovery of LPV/r-based regimens in pediatric HIV treatment: a multicenter cohort study in resource-constrained settings of China.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Potent Synergistic Interactions between Lopinavir and Azole Antifungal Drugs against Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Optimizing Pediatric Dosing Recommendations and Treatment Management of Antiretroviral Drugs Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Children Living With HIV.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2019Review
- The Global Health Impact Index: Promoting Global Health.PloS one · 2015Article
- Second-line protease inhibitor-based HAART after failing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in Asian HIV-infected children.Antiviral therapy · 2013Article
- Pharmacokinetic optimization of antiretroviral therapy in children and adolescents.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011Review
- Generic and low dose antiretroviral therapy in adults and children: implication for scaling up treatment in resource limited settings.AIDS research and therapy · 2010Article
- Comment on: Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2010Article
- Novel strategies in the use of lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of HIV infection in children.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLopinavir/ritonavir is a common protease inhibitor (PI) used for second-line regimens in children. Several studies have shown higher plasma concentrations of antiretroviral agents in Thai adults than in Caucasians, suggesting that lower doses may be used.
methodsAn open label study in 24 HIV-infected children between the age of 2 and 18 years, naive to PIs, randomized to receive either the WHO-recommended dose of lopinavir/ritonavir or a low dose (70% of the standard dose) twice daily in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. A 12 h pharmacokinetic study was done at 4-6 weeks after starting treatment. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at week 48. The clinical trial number of the study is NCT00887120.
resultsThe medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)] of age, body surface area, percentage CD4 and plasma HIV RNA were 9.5 years (7.0-12.3), 0.9 m(2) (0.8-1.1), 17% (11%-24%) and 4.6 log(10) copies/mL (4.1-4.9), respectively. The median (IQR) lopinavir dose was 279 mg/m(2)/dose (263-294) and 194 mg/m(2)/dose (176-206) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively. Median (IQR) AUC(0-12) and C(trough) of lopinavir were 117.6 mg.h/L (74.0-128.5) and 4.9 mg/L (2.7-8.0) for the standard arm and 83.8 mg.h/L (56.0-112.9) and 3.4 mg/L (2.7-5.4) for the low-dose arm. One child in the low-dose arm had a lopinavir pre-dose level of <1.0 mg/L. At week 48, the median percentage CD4 was 22% (15%-28%) and 27% (21%-31%) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively, while 50% and 83% of children had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL, respectively (P = 0.19).
conclusionsLow-dose lopinavir displayed adequate pharmacokinetic parameters and good efficacy as compared with standard-dose lopinavir in Thai children. A larger study to investigate the efficacy of low-dose lopinavir is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.