Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19729375›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2009

Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.

Thanyawee Puthanakit, Jasper van der Lugt, Torsak Bunupuradah, Jintanat Ananworanich, Meena Gorowara, Chayapa Phasomsap, Thidarat Jupimai, Pitch Boonrak, Chitsanu Pancharoen, David Burger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00887120 (Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Low- or Standard-dose of Lopinavir/Ritonavir), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00887120 phase2completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Low- or Standard-dose of Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra®) in PI-naïve HIV-1 Infected Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research CollaborationRan2007 to 2009Enrolled24ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsLopinavir/ritonavir standard dose According to WHO simplified dosing table, Lopinavir/ritonavir low dose ( 70% of WHO recommended dosing table)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thanyawee PuthanakitHIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration (HIV-NAT), Bangkok, Thailand. thanyawee.p@hivnat.org
Jasper van der Lugt
Torsak Bunupuradah
Jintanat Ananworanich
Meena Gorowara
Chayapa Phasomsap
Thidarat Jupimai
Pitch Boonrak
Chitsanu Pancharoen
David Burger
Kiat Ruxrungtham
HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration · THChulalongkorn University · THRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLopinavir/ritonavir is a common protease inhibitor (PI) used for second-line regimens in children. Several studies have shown higher plasma concentrations of antiretroviral agents in Thai adults than in Caucasians, suggesting that lower doses may be used.

methodsAn open label study in 24 HIV-infected children between the age of 2 and 18 years, naive to PIs, randomized to receive either the WHO-recommended dose of lopinavir/ritonavir or a low dose (70% of the standard dose) twice daily in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. A 12 h pharmacokinetic study was done at 4-6 weeks after starting treatment. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at week 48. The clinical trial number of the study is NCT00887120.

resultsThe medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)] of age, body surface area, percentage CD4 and plasma HIV RNA were 9.5 years (7.0-12.3), 0.9 m(2) (0.8-1.1), 17% (11%-24%) and 4.6 log(10) copies/mL (4.1-4.9), respectively. The median (IQR) lopinavir dose was 279 mg/m(2)/dose (263-294) and 194 mg/m(2)/dose (176-206) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively. Median (IQR) AUC(0-12) and C(trough) of lopinavir were 117.6 mg.h/L (74.0-128.5) and 4.9 mg/L (2.7-8.0) for the standard arm and 83.8 mg.h/L (56.0-112.9) and 3.4 mg/L (2.7-5.4) for the low-dose arm. One child in the low-dose arm had a lopinavir pre-dose level of <1.0 mg/L. At week 48, the median percentage CD4 was 22% (15%-28%) and 27% (21%-31%) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively, while 50% and 83% of children had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL, respectively (P = 0.19).

conclusionsLow-dose lopinavir displayed adequate pharmacokinetic parameters and good efficacy as compared with standard-dose lopinavir in Thai children. A larger study to investigate the efficacy of low-dose lopinavir is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLamivudineLopinavirMalePlasmaPyrimidinonesRitonavirRNA, ViralAnti-HIV AgentsLamivudineLopinavirPyrimidinonesRitonavirRNA, ViralZidovudine

Identifiers

PMID19729375
OpenAlexW2106855395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.