Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19729374›Full record

ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2009

Towards evolving a better repressor.

Robert Daber, Mitchell Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Practical genetic control strategies for industrial bioprocesses.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Predictive shifts in free energy couple mutations to their phenotypic consequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Napoleon Is in Equilibrium.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Thermodynamic analysis of mutant lac repressors.Journal of molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert DaberDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059, USA.
Mitchell Lewis

Funding

STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008275 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WAND, A. JOSHUA · 1988 to 2018
$6.0M
Structural Studies of Transcriptional RegulatorsR01GM044617 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEWIS, MITCHELL · 1990 to 2011
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-44617NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation is an essential component of all metabolic pathways. At the most basic level, a protein binds to a particular DNA sequence (operator) on the genome and either positively or negatively alters the level of transcription. Together, the protein and its operator form an epigenetic switch that regulates gene expression. In an effort to produce a 'better' switch, we have discovered novel facets of the lac operon that are responsible for optimal functionality. We have uncovered a relationship between operator binding affinity and inducibility and demonstrated that the operator DNA is not a passive component of a genetic switch; it is responsible for establishing binding affinity, specificity as well as translational efficiency. In addition, an operator's directionality can indirectly affect gene expression. Unraveling the basic properties of this classical epigenetic switch demonstrates that multiple factors must be optimized in designing a better switch.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringBase SequenceDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLac OperonLac RepressorsModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BiosynthesisProtein ConformationRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLac RepressorsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19729374
PMCPMC2763795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.