Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19728786›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2010

High-content drug screening with engineered musculoskeletal tissues.

Herman Vandenburgh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Pound of Flesh: What Cachexia Is and What It Is Not.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 3D Bioprinting in Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Scalable 3D Printed Molds for Human Tissue Engineered Skeletal Muscle.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Herman VandenburghDepartment of Pathology, Brown Medical School-Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02906, USA. hvandenburgh@myomics.com

Funding

High Content Screening for Muscular DystrophyR44NS059098 · NINDS · MYOMICS, INC. · PI VANDENBURGH, HERMAN H · 2009 to 2010
$992k
Adult human skeletal muscle stem cells for functional repairR43AG029705 · NIA · MYOMICS, INC. · PI VANDENBURGH, HERMAN H · 2007 to 2008
$500k
High Content Screening for Muscular DystrophyR43NS059098 · NINDS · MYOMICS, INC. · PI VANDENBURGH, HERMAN H · 2007 to 2007
$100k
High Content Drug Screening with Cardiac TissueR43HL093939 · NHLBI · MYOMICS, INC. · PI VANDENBURGH, HERMAN H · 2008 to 2008
$98k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL HL093939NIA NIH HHS AG029705NINDS NIH HHS NS059098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering for in vitro drug-screening applications based on tissue function is an active area of translational research. Compared to targeted high-throughput drug-screening methods that rapidly analyze hundreds of thousands of compounds affecting a single biochemical reaction or gene expression, high-content screening (HCS) with engineered tissues is more complex and based on the cumulative positive and negative effects of a compound on the multiple pathways altering tissue function. It may therefore serve as better predictor of in vivo activity and serve as a bridge between high-throughput drug screening and in vivo animal studies. In the case of the musculoskeletal system, tissue function includes determining improvements in the mechanical properties of bone, tendon, cartilage, and, for skeletal muscle, contractile properties such as rate of contraction/relaxation, force generation, fatigability, and recovery from fatigue. HCS of compound banks with engineered tissues requires miniature musculoskeletal organs as well as automated functional testing. The resulting technologies should be rapid, cost effective, and reduce the number of small animals required for follow-on in vivo studies. Identification of compounds that improve the repair/regeneration of damaged tissues in vivo would have extensive clinical applications for treating musculoskeletal disorders.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysMusculoskeletal SystemAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID19728786
PMCPMC2865990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.