Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19727270›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))2008

Psychiatric Diagnosis and the Pathologist's View of Schizophrenia.

Ronald Pies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The potential of biomarkers in psychiatry: focus on proteomics.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald PiesProfessor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; and Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Tufts USM, Boston, Massachusetts.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A popular canard among critics of psychiatry is that psychiatric disorders are never listed in pathology textbooks. This erroneous claim is sometimes used to argue that some diseases such as schizophrenia are not "real" diseases, but merely metaphorical inventions of psychiatrists. In reality, many pathology and pathophysiology texts now recognize schizophrenia as bona fide disease, and physicians should resist attempts to marginalize psychiatry by those who claim otherwise. However, judgments concerning the "reality" of disease ought to be based on our everyday observations of suffering and incapacity, not on pronouncements in textbooks. Disease is properly predicated of persons, not of minds, bodies, tissues, or organs.

Indexed as

diseasepathologypsychiatryreliability of diagnosesvalidity of diagnoses

Identifiers

PMID19727270
PMCPMC2695726
OpenAlexW2112155012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.