ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2009
Influence of vagotomy on monosynaptic transmission at second-order nucleus tractus solitarius synapses.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise training to reduce sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Vagotomy blunts cardiorespiratory responses to vagal afferent stimulation via pre- and postsynaptic effects in the nucleus tractus solitarii.The Journal of physiology · 2024Article
- Unilateral vagotomy alters astrocyte and microglial morphology in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021Article
- Withdrawal and restoration of central vagal afferents within the dorsal vagal complex following subdiaphragmatic vagotomy.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2013Article
- Mechanisms of dyspnea.Chest · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Manipulations of vagal activity are used to treat medical pathologies, but the underlying CNS changes caused by these treatments are not well understood. Furthermore, heart and lung transplant as well as treatments for many gastrointestinal disorders result in section of the vagus nerve (vagotomy). Following unilateral vagotomy under isoflurane anesthesia of Sprague-Dawley rats, electrophysiological properties were recorded with whole cell patch techniques in horizontal brain stem slices. Vagotomy significantly reduced the median amplitude of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (evEPSCs; -121; n = 43) in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) when compared with controls (-157 pA; n = 66; P < 0.05) but had no significant effect on the passive properties or on the average amplitude or frequency of miniature EPSCs. The degree of synaptic failure exhibited during a 50-Hz train of stimuli was used to define two separate classes of synapses: "low failure" and "high failure" (HF); failure rates <5 and > or =5%, respectively. HF synapses had significantly smaller median evEPSCs (-88 vs. -184 pA; P < 0.05). After vagotomy, the percentage of HF synapses nearly doubled to 56% (n = 24/43) when compared with controls (30%; n = 20/66). Additionally, the overall percentage of failures after the second to fifth stimuli significantly increased by at least twofold. These results suggest that vagotomy causes a decrease in synaptic efficacy by both increasing the overall percentage of synaptic failures and shifting the population of NTS synapses toward more HF transmission. In addition, the alterations due to vagotomy are likely to be presynaptic in nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.