ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2009
Simple and rapid lateral-flow assay for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review of lateral flow assays in rapid livestock and poultry disease diagnostics.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026Article
- Foot-and-mouth disease in Asia.Virus research · 2025Review
- Article
- Effective Diagnosis of Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) Serotypes O and A Based on Optical and Electrochemical Dual-Modal Detection.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Sensitive and rapid lateral-flow assay for early detection of subclinical mammary infection in dairy cows.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Thermographic detection and quantification of THC in oral fluid at unprecedented low concentrations.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Advances in the Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Review
- Development of a lateral flow test for the rapid detection of Avibacterium paragallinarum in chickens suspected of having infectious coryza.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- Rapid Engineering of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine and Challenge Viruses.Journal of virology · 2017Article
- Preparation and evaluation ofVeterinary world · 2017Article
- Dual Recognition Element Lateral Flow Assay Toward Multiplex Strain Specific Influenza Virus Detection.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Novel foot-and-mouth disease virus in Korea, July-August 2014.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2016Article
- Challenges and prospects for the control of foot-and-mouth disease: an African perspective.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014Review
- Challenges and economic implications in the control of foot and mouth disease in sub-saharan Africa: lessons from the zambian experience.Veterinary medicine international · 2014Review
- Development of a Luminex assay for the detection of swine antibodies to non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus.Journal of immunological methods · 2013Article
- A simple and rapid colloidal gold-based immunochromatogarpic strip test for detection of FMDV serotype A.Virologica Sinica · 2011Article
- A Brief Review on Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease of Livestock: Conventional to Molecular Tools.Veterinary medicine international · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A simple lateral-flow assay (LFA) based on a monoclonal antibody (MAb 70-17) was developed for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) under nonlaboratory conditions. The LFA was evaluated with epithelial suspensions (n = 704) prepared from current and historical field samples which had been submitted to the Pirbright Laboratory (United Kingdom) and from negative samples (n = 100) collected from naïve animals in Korea. Four FMDV serotypes (type O, A, Asia 1, and C) were detected in the LFA, but not the remaining three FMDV serotypes (SAT 1, SAT 2, and SAT 3). The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFA for FMDV types O, A, C, and Asia 1 was similar, at approximately 87.3%, to that of 87.7% obtained with antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ag-ELISA). The diagnostic specificity of the LFA was 98.8%, compared to 100% for the Ag-ELISA. These results demonstrate that the LFA using the FMDV MAb 70-17 to detect FMDV is a supportive method for taking rapid measurements at the site of a suspected foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Asia before diagnosing the disease in the laboratory, thereby offering the possibility of implementing control procedures more rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.