Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19726046›Full record

ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2009

Methods for proteomic analysis of transcription factors.

Daifeng Jiang, Harry W Jarrett, William E Haskins

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unraveling biomolecular interactions: a comprehensive review of the electromobility shift assay.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Systems Biology for Drug Target Discovery in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daifeng JiangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Harry W Jarrett
William E Haskins
The University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL VISUALIZATION IN BIOINFORMATICSG12RR013646 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI WENK, CAROLA · 1998 to 2011
$19.6M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR013646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigation of the transcription factor (TF) proteome presents challenges including the large number of low abundance and post-translationally modified proteins involved. Specialized purification and analysis methods have been developed over the last decades which facilitate the study of the TF proteome and these are reviewed here. Generally applicable proteomics methods that have been successfully applied are also discussed. TFs are selectively purified by affinity techniques using the DNA response element (RE) as the basis for highly specific binding, and several agents have been discovered that either enhance binding or diminish non-specific binding. One such affinity method called "trapping" enables purification of TFs bound to nM concentrations and recovery of TF complexes in a highly purified state. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is the most important assay of TFs because it provides both measures of the affinity and amount of the TF present. Southwestern (SW) blotting and DNA-protein crosslinking (DPC) allow in vitro estimates of DNA-binding-protein mass, while chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) allows confirmation of promoter binding in vivo. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis methods (2-DE), and 3-DE methods which combines EMSA with 2-DE, allow further resolution of TFs. The synergy of highly selective purification and analytical strategies has led to an explosion of knowledge about the TF proteome and the proteomes of other DNA- and RNA-binding proteins.

Indexed as

Analytic Sample Preparation MethodsAnimalsBlotting, SouthwesternChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatography, AffinityCross-Linking ReagentsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ConcatenatedElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayHumansMicrochemistryPeptide FragmentsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsCross-Linking ReagentsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ConcatenatedPeptide FragmentsRNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19726046
PMCPMC2778203
OpenAlexW2060699025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.