Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19725916›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2009

The aortic ring model of angiogenesis: a quarter century of search and discovery.

R F Nicosia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anti-angiogenic effects ofExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Serum-Free Mouse Aortic Ring Assay of Angiogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. mPR-Specific Actions Influence Maintenance of the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ex Vivo Mouse Aortic Ring Angiogenesis Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F NicosiaPathology and Laboratory Medicine Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. roberto.nicosia@va.gov
VA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

PARACRINE REGULATION OF ANGIOGENESIS BY MURAL CELLSR01HL052585 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NICOSIA, ROBERTO · 1995 to 2010
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL52585NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL052585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aortic ring model has become one of the most widely used methods to study angiogenesis and its mechanisms. Many factors have contributed to its popularity including reproducibility, cost effectiveness, ease of use and good correlation with in vivo studies. In this system aortic rings embedded in biomatrix gels and cultured under chemically defined conditions generate arborizing vascular outgrowths which can be stimulated or inhibited with angiogenic regulators. Originally based on the rat aorta, the aortic ring model was later adapted to the mouse for the evaluation of specific molecular alterations in genetically modified animals. Viral transduction of the aortic rings has enabled investigators to overexpress genes of interest in the aortic cultures. Experiments on angiogenic mechanisms have demonstrated that formation of neovessels in aortic cultures is regulated by macrophages, pericytes and fibroblasts through a complex molecular cascade involving growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, axonal guidance cues, extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and matrix-degrading proteolytic enzymes. These studies have shown that endothelial sprouting can be effectively blocked by depleting the aortic explants of macrophages or by interfering with the angiogenic cascade at multiple levels including growth factor signalling, cell adhesion and proteolytic degradation of the ECM. In this paper, we review the literature in this field and retrace the journey from our first morphological descriptions of the aortic outgrowths to the latest breakthroughs in the cellular and molecular regulation of aortic vessel growth and regression.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsAortaBlood VesselsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNeoplasmsPeptide HydrolasesSignal TransductionPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID19725916
PMCPMC4496118
OpenAlexW1970606334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.