Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19725770›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2010

Assessment of polymicrobial infections in ticks in New York state.

Rafal Tokarz, Komal Jain, Ashlee Bennett, Thomas Briese, W Ian Lipkin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HumanPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Repeated Tick Infestations ImpairPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Infection withViruses · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The environment, the tick, and the pathogen - It is an ensemble.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Discovery and Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens.Journal of medical entomology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafal TokarzCenter for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Komal Jain
Ashlee Bennett
Thomas Briese
W Ian Lipkin
Columbia University · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LIPKIN, W. IAN · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI57158-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ixodes scapularis ticks are clinically important hematophagous vectors. A single tick bite can lead to a polymicrobial infection. We determined the prevalence of polymicrobial infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti, Borrelia miyamotoi, and Powassan virus in 286 adult ticks from the two counties in New York State where Lyme disease is endemic, utilizing a MassTag multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay. Seventy-one percent of the ticks harbored at least one organism; 30% had a polymicrobial infection. Infections with three microbes were detected in 5% of the ticks. One tick was infected with four organisms. Our results show that coinfection is a frequent occurrence in ticks in the two counties surveyed.

Indexed as

IxodesAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsBabesia microtiBorreliaBorrelia burgdorferiDermacentorEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneNew YorkPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID19725770
PMCPMC2883481
OpenAlexW2071212309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.