Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19725595›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2009

A population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin applicable for assisting dose management of kidney transplant recipients.

Pål Falck, Karsten Midtvedt, Thanh Trúc Vân Lê, Live Storehagen, Hallvard Holdaas, Anders Hartmann, Anders Asberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pål FalckDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karsten Midtvedt
Thanh Trúc Vân Lê
Live Storehagen
Hallvard Holdaas
Anders Hartmann
Anders Asberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe pharmacokinetic disposition of ciclosporin shows great intra- and interpatient variability, and that combined with a narrow therapeutic window makes therapeutic drug monitoring of ciclosporin necessary. The nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic program NONMEM predicts individual pharmacokinetic parameters based not only on individual patient observations but also on population characteristics and the patient's covariates. The aim of this model development is to potentially use it in the clinical setting to optimize ciclosporin dosing in renal transplant recipients.

methodsA population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin has been developed with NONMEM using full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles from 29 renal transplant recipients, 3 months of daily follow-up data from an additional 11 recipients, and both 3 months of follow-up data and full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles from nine patients. The internal validation of the model was based on data splitting and jack-knife methods. In addition, the model was validated for its clinical applicability on standard trough and 2-hour post-dose concentration data from 12 additional patients with 3 months of follow-up.

resultsThe model that best described the ciclosporin data was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption process with lagged time. The population pharmacokinetic parameters were oral clearance (CL/F) = 26.9 L/h; central volume of distribution after oral administration (V(1)/F) = 24.4 L; absorption rate constant (k(a)) = 0.544 h-1; lag time = 0.460 h; peripheral volume of distribution = 1119 L and intercompartmental clearance after oral administration (Q/F) = 19.6 L/h. Three covariates had significant effect on a total of six pharmacokinetic parameters. These were bodyweight on V(1)/F and k(a), time after transplantation on k(a), and age on CL/F, k(a) and V(1)/F. Cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype was also a significant covariate but was not included in the final model since such information is not available in clinical practice. The external validation showed that the model was able to predict ciclosporin concentrations in the 12 new patients with an average predictive error of 17.4 +/- 14% when the standard sample concentrations from the previous week were given.

conclusionA NONMEM pharmacokinetic model for ciclosporin in renal transplant recipients was successfully developed and validated for the first 3 months post-transplantation. The model showed good predictability in a new patient cohort. After further clinical validation, the model may be applicable as a clinical tool for optimizing ciclosporin dosing in renal transplant recipients in the early post-transplant period.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsModels, BiologicalAdultAgedBayes TheoremClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationCyclosporineData CollectionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedCyclosporineImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.