ArticlePsychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))2009
Use of Structured Interviews by Psychiatrists in Real Clinical Settings: Results of an Open-question Survey.
Article in Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Evaluating the Construct Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Klenico Depression Domain in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Care: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women in a Symptom-Reporting Sample.Assessment · 2025Article
- Article
- Operational criteria application does not change clinicians' opinion on the diagnosis of mental disorder: a pre- and post-intervention validity study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Child posttraumatic stress symptoms in an acute injury sample: Patterns of associations among child report, parent report, and child heart rate parameters.Journal of traumatic stress · 2023Article
- The weaponization of medicine: Early psychosis in the Black community and the need for racially informed mental healthcare.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Measurement-based Care in Psychiatry-Past, Present, and Future.Innovations in clinical neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
- Suicide risk among prisoners in French Guiana: prevalence and predictive factors.BMC psychiatry · 2017Article
- How Do Psychiatrists Apply the Minimum Clinically Important Difference to Assess Patient Responses to Treatment?MDM policy & practiceArticle
- The Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): A Clinician-administered Tool with Categorical, Dimensional, and Numeric Output-Conceptual Development, Design, and Description of the SCIP.Innovations in clinical neuroscienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatry (Edgemont) readers were surveyed about whether or not they use structured interviews in real clinical settings. Forty psychiatrists responded to the survey: six psychiatrists in private practices and 34 faculty psychiatrists. The majority of psychiatrists (72.5%) do not use structured interviews and 27.5 percent use some structured interviews in clinical settings. The three most commonly cited reasons for not using structured interviews were "constraints of time," "structured interviews are research tools," and "structured interviews interfere with establishing rapport with patients." Other reasons why psychiatrists do not use structured interviews are analyzed and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19724758PMC2720839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.