Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19724705›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of parasitology2009

Comparative sensitivity of PCR primer sets for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum.

Jae-Ran Yu, Soo-Ung Lee, Woo-Yoon Park

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of parasitology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and molecular characterization ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiplex-Touchdown PCR to Simultaneously DetectThe Korean journal of parasitology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic dip strip test for simultaneous detection of Cryptosporidium spp, Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba histolytica antigens in human faecal samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jae-Ran YuDepartment of Environmental and Tropical Medicine, Konkuk University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. maria205@kku.ac.kr
Soo-Ung Lee
Woo-Yoon Park

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved methods for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in environmental and clinical samples are urgently needed to improve detection of cryptosporidiosis. We compared the sensitivity of 7 PCR primer sets for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Each target gene was amplified by PCR or nested PCR with serially diluted DNA extracted from purified C. parvum oocysts. The target genes included Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP), small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA), and random amplified polymorphic DNA. The detection limit of the PCR method ranged from 10(3) to 10(4) oocysts, and the nested PCR method was able to detect 10(0) to 10(2) oocysts. A second-round amplification of target genes showed that the nested primer set specific for the COWP gene proved to be the most sensitive one compared to the other primer sets tested in this study and would therefore be useful for the detection of C. parvum.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanCOWP geneCryptosporidium parvumnested PCRSSU rRNA

Identifiers

PMID19724705
PMCPMC2735697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.