Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19723782›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2009

Lack of adequate appreciation of physical exercise's complexities can pre-empt appropriate design and interpretation in scientific discovery.

F W Booth, M J Laye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multimorbidity, Function, and Cognition in Aging.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Muscle Wasting Diseases: Novel Targets and Treatments.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Health Benefits of Exercise.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F W BoothVeterinary Medicine Bldg E102, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. boothf@missouri.edu
M J Laye

Funding

SATELLITE STEM CELL BIOLOGYR01AG018780 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BOOTH, FRANK W · 2000 to 2008
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS AG18780NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two major issues are presented. First, a challenge is made by us that a misunderstanding of physiology has led to incomplete or wrong functional designations of genes in some cases. Normal physiological processes are dynamic, integrated and periodic, and, therefore, it is difficult to define normal physiological function by looking at a single time point or single process in a non-stressed subject. The ability of the organism to successfully respond to homeostatic disruptions defines normal physiology. Genes were selected for survival and to appropriately respond to stresses, such as physical activity. Omitting gene functions by restricting them to non-stressful conditions could lead to less than optimal primary preventions, treatments and cures for diseases. Physical exercise, as a stressor, should be used to better demonstrate the complete functional classifications of some genes. Second, the challenge from others of an 'exercise pill' as a mimetic of natural physical activity will be shown to be lacking a scientific basis. The concept of an 'exercise pill'/'exercise mimetic' demonstrates an inadequate appreciation of the complexities in integrating cell, tissue, organ and systems during both acute disruptions in homeostasis by a single bout of exercise, and longer-term chronic adaptations to different types of exercise such as resistance and endurance. It is our opinion that those promoting drugs targeting a single or few molecules should not redefine the term 'exercise' and exercise concepts in an attempt to sensationalize findings. Additionally, the scientific criteria that the authors demand to be met to legitimately use the terms 'exercise pill' and 'exercise mimetic' are presented.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdenylate KinaseAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrug DiscoveryExerciseGene ExpressionGeneticsHumansMiceMice, KnockoutPhysical Conditioning, AnimalProtein BiosynthesisPublic HealthRestAdenylate KinaseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19723782
PMCPMC2805365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.