Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19723653›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2009

The prioritization of cancer antigens: a national cancer institute pilot project for the acceleration of translational research.

Martin A Cheever, James P Allison, Andrea S Ferris, Olivera J Finn, Benjamin M Hastings, Toby T Hecht, Ira Mellman, Sheila A Prindiville, Jaye L Viner, Louis M Weiner and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02649829 (First-line Immunotherapy Using Wilms' Tumor Protein 1), which is not on this map. Cited by 807 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
807citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02649829 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

First-line Immunotherapy Using Wilms' Tumor Protein 1 (WT1)-Targeted Dendritic Cell Vaccinations for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2017 to 2025Enrolled28ConditionsMalignant Pleural MesotheliomaArmsdendritic cell vaccination plus chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

807 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,363 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

747 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Martin A CheeverFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. mcheever@seattlecca.org
James P Allison
Andrea S Ferris
Olivera J Finn
Benjamin M Hastings
Toby T Hecht
Ira Mellman
Sheila A Prindiville
Jaye L Viner
Louis M Weiner
Lynn M Matrisian
National Cancer Institute · USGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 15704-35NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR 025014-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the National Cancer Institute pilot project to prioritize cancer antigens was to develop a well-vetted, priority-ranked list of cancer vaccine target antigens based on predefined and preweighted objective criteria. An additional aim was for the National Cancer Institute to test a new approach for prioritizing translational research opportunities based on an analytic hierarchy process for dealing with complex decisions. Antigen prioritization involved developing a list of "ideal" cancer antigen criteria/characteristics, assigning relative weights to those criteria using pairwise comparisons, selecting 75 representative antigens for comparison and ranking, assembling information on the predefined criteria for the selected antigens, and ranking the antigens based on the predefined, preweighted criteria. Using the pairwise approach, the result of criteria weighting, in descending order, was as follows: (a) therapeutic function, (b) immunogenicity, (c) role of the antigen in oncogenicity, (d) specificity, (e) expression level and percent of antigen-positive cells, (f) stem cell expression, (g) number of patients with antigen-positive cancers, (h) number of antigenic epitopes, and (i) cellular location of antigen expression. None of the 75 antigens had all of the characteristics of the ideal cancer antigen. However, 46 were immunogenic in clinical trials and 20 of them had suggestive clinical efficacy in the "therapeutic function" category. These findings reflect the current status of the cancer vaccine field, highlight the possibility that additional organized efforts and funding would accelerate the development of therapeutically effective cancer vaccines, and accentuate the need for prioritization.

Indexed as

Program DevelopmentAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsUnited StatesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19723653
PMCPMC5779623
OpenAlexW2134121541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.