ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2009
Treatment of lymphoma with adoptively transferred T cells.
Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular pathogenesis of B-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: what do we know so far?Clinical & developmental immunology · 2013Review
- Inhibition of p38 MAPK activity in B-NHL Raji cells by treatment with engineered CD20-specific T cells.Oncology letters · 2011Article
- Potential therapeutic strategy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma by anti-CD20scFvFc/CD28/CD3zeta gene tranfected T cells.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2010Article
- Redirecting T-cell specificity by introducing a tumor-specific chimeric antigen receptor.Blood · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy-resistant lymphomas can be cured with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, demonstrating the susceptibility of these tumors to T cell mediated immune responses. However, high rates of transplant-related morbidity and mortality limit this approach. Efforts have, therefore, been made to develop alternative T cell based therapies, and there is growing evidence that adoptive therapy with T cells targeted to lymphoma-associated antigens may be a safe and effective new method for treating this group of diseases. OBJECTIVE/
methodsWe review publications on adoptive therapy with ex vivo expanded T cells targeting viral antigens, as well as genetically modified autologous T cells, as strategies for the treatment of lymphoma, with the goal of providing an overview of these approaches. RESULTS/
conclusionsEpstein-Barr virus specific T cell therapy is an effective and safe method of treating Epstein-Barr virus associated lymphomas; however, most lymphoma subtypes do not express EBV antigens. For these diseases, adoptive immunotherapy with genetically modified T cells expressing chimeric T cell receptors targeting lymphoma-associated antigens such as CD19 and CD20 appears to be a promising alternative. Recent innovations including enhanced co-stimulation, exogenous cytokine administration and use of memory T cells promise to overcome many of the limitations and pitfalls initially encountered with this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.