Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19722897›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2009

DNA vaccines in veterinary use.

Laurel Redding, David B Weiner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Challenges of Vaccination in Fish Health Management.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  6. Nuxcell NeoFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. RNA-Based Vaccines and Therapeutics Against Intracellular Pathogens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurel ReddingUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. lredding@vet.upenn.edu
David B Weiner

Funding

T Cell Functionality After DNA and Adjuvant VaccinationP01AI071739 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEINER, DAVID B. · 2007 to 2013
$10.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI071739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccines represent a new frontier in vaccine technology. One important application of this technology is in the veterinary arena. DNA vaccines have already gained a foothold in certain fields of veterinary medicine. However, several important questions must be addressed when developing DNA vaccines for animals, including whether or not the vaccine is efficacious and cost effective compared with currently available options. Another important question to consider is how to apply this developing technology in a wide range of different situations, from the domestic pet to individual fish in fisheries with several thousand animals, to wildlife programs for disease control. In some cases, DNA vaccines represent an interesting option for vaccination, while in others, currently available options are sufficient. This review will examine a number of diseases of veterinary importance and the progress being made in DNA vaccine technology relevant to these diseases, and we compare these with the conventional treatment options available.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCommunicable DiseasesVaccinationVaccines, DNAVeterinary MedicineVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19722897
PMCPMC4425421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.