Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19722212›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2009

Highly efficient capture and enumeration of low abundance prostate cancer cells using prostate-specific membrane antigen aptamers immobilized to a polymeric microfluidic device.

Udara Dharmasiri, Subramanian Balamurugan, André A Adams, Paul I Okagbare, Annie Obubuafo, Steven A Soper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Living Cell Microarrays: An Overview of Concepts.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Udara DharmasiriDepartment of Chemistry and Center for BioModular Multi-Scale Systems, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Subramanian Balamurugan
André A Adams
Paul I Okagbare
Annie Obubuafo
Steven A Soper
Louisiana State University · US

Funding

Microsampling Unit for Capturing Low Abundant CellsR33CA099246 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2004 to 2006
$1.4M
Microsampling Unit for Capturing Low Abundant CellsR21CA099246 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SOPER, STEVEN A. · 2003 to 2003
$147k
NCI NIH HHS 1 R33 CA099246-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA099246NCI NIH HHS R33 CA099246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate tumor cells over-express a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) that can be used as a marker to select these cells from highly heterogeneous clinical samples, even when found in low abundance. Antibodies and aptamers have been developed that specifically bind to PSMA. In this study, anti-PSMA aptamers were immobilized onto the surface of a capture bed poised within a PMMA, microchip, which was fabricated into a high-throughput micro-sampling unit (HTMSU) used for the selective isolation of rare circulating prostate tumor cells resident in a peripheral blood matrix. The HTMSU capture bed consisted of 51 ultra-high-aspect ratio parallel curvilinear channels with a width similar to the prostate cancer cell dimensions. The surface density of the PSMA-specific aptamers on an ultraviolet-modified PMMA microfluidic capture bed surface was determined to be 8.4 x 10(12) molecules/cm(2). Using a linear velocity for optimal cell capture in the aptamer-tethered HTMSU (2.5 mm/s), a recovery of 90% of LNCaP cells (prostate cancer cell line; used as a model in this example) was found. Due to the low abundance of these cells, the input volume required was 1 mL and this could be processed in approximately 29 min using an optimized linear flow rate of 2.5 mm/s. Captured cells were subsequently released intact from the affinity surface using 0.25% w/w trypsin followed by counting individual cells using a contact conductivity sensor integrated into the HTMSU that provided high detection and sampling efficiency (approximately 100%) and did not require staining of the cells for enumeration.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ImmobilizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAptamers, PeptideCell CountCell Line, TumorCell SeparationHumansLinear ModelsMaleMicroelectrodesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPlatinumProstate-Specific AntigenAntibodies, ImmobilizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAptamers, PeptidePlatinumProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID19722212
PMCPMC3010183
OpenAlexW1995249314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.