Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19721785›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2009

Seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection among cats in Canada.

Susan Little, William Sears, Jessica Lachtara, Dorothee Bienzle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 2020 AAFP Feline Retrovirus Testing and Management Guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma by means of PRGFFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Concomitant feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) andThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan LittleBytown Cat Hospital, 422 McArthur Ave., Ottawa, Ontario K1K 1G6, Canada. catvet@vin.com
William Sears
Jessica Lachtara
Dorothee Bienzle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection among cats in Canada and to identify risk factors for seropositivity. Signalment, lifestyle factors, and test results for FeLV antigen and FIV antibody were analyzed for 11 144 cats from the 10 Canadian provinces. Seroprevalence for FIV antibody was 4.3% and seroprevalence for FeLV antigen was 3.4%. Fifty-eight cats (0.5%) were seropositive for both viruses. Seroprevalence varied geographically. Factors such as age, gender, health status, and lifestyle were significantly associated with risk of FeLV and FIV seropositivity. The results suggest that cats in Canada are at risk of retrovirus infection and support current recommendations that the retrovirus status of all cats should be known.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCanadaCatsFeline Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeFemaleImmunodeficiency Virus, FelineLeukemia, FelineLeukemia Virus, FelineMaleRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19721785
PMCPMC2684053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.