ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2009
Influencing preschoolers' free-play activity preferences: an evaluation of satiation and embedded reinforcement.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coaching via Telehealth: Caregiver-Mediated Interventions for Young Children on the Waitlist for an Autism Diagnosis Using Single-Case Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Don'T wag the dog: extending the reach of applied behavior analysis.The Behavior analyst · 2013Article
- Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preferences for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2011Article
- Effects of motivating operations on problem and academic behavior in classrooms.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2011Article
- Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2011Article
- Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.Behavior analysis in practice · 2010Article
- A method for describing preschoolers' activity preferences.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2007Article
- The effectiveness of and preschoolers' preferences for variations of multiple-schedule arrangements.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study evaluated the effects of classwide satiation and embedded reinforcement procedures on preschoolers' activity preferences during scheduled free-play periods. The goal of the study was to increase time allocation to originally nonpreferred, but important, activities (instructional zone, library, and science) while continuing to provide access to all free-play activities. The satiation intervention applied to preferred activities resulted in increased time allocation to the instructional and science activities, the customized embedded reinforcement interventions resulted in increased time allocation to all three target activities, and high levels of attendance to the instructional and library activities were maintained during follow-up observations. Implications for the design of preschool free-play periods are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.