ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2009
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes by birth setting and caregiver for low risk women in Indonesia: a systematic literature review.Reproductive health · 2019Pooled it
- Transfer to hospital in planned home births: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Pooled it
- The effect of health facility delivery on neonatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Pooled it
- Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Safe birth in cultural safety in southern Mexico: a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Trial
- Selective nonreporting of 5-min Apgar scores and its safety assessment of out-of-hospital births: a population-based study of United States' birth data, 2016-2023 a population based study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Planned Community Birth and Birth Outcomes.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exploring the landscape of Canadian midwifery research: strengths, gaps and priorities - results of a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Perinatal outcomes of midwife-led care, stratified by medical risk: a retrospective cohort study from British Columbia (2008-2018).CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Cost analysis of planned out-of-hospital births in Italy.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Laying the foundation for Real-world evidence studies: a case study from Newfoundland and Labrador.International journal of population data science · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2022Observational
- Non-profit hospital mergers: the effect on healthcare costs and utilization.International journal of health economics and management · 2021Article
- Association of timing of birth with mortality among preterm infants born in Canada.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Client Experience with the Ontario Birth Center Demonstration Project.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021Article
- Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies of planned home births attended by registered midwives have been limited by incomplete data, nonrepresentative sampling, inadequate statistical power and the inability to exclude unplanned home births. We compared the outcomes of planned home births attended by midwives with those of planned hospital births attended by midwives or physicians.
methodsWe included all planned home births attended by registered midwives from Jan. 1, 2000, to Dec. 31, 2004, in British Columbia, Canada (n = 2889), and all planned hospital births meeting the eligibility requirements for home birth that were attended by the same cohort of midwives (n = 4752). We also included a matched sample of physician-attended planned hospital births (n = 5331). The primary outcome measure was perinatal mortality; secondary outcomes were obstetric interventions and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
resultsThe rate of perinatal death per 1000 births was 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-1.03) in the group of planned home births; the rate in the group of planned hospital births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.00-1.43) among women attended by a midwife and 0.64 (95% CI 0.00-1.56) among those attended by a physician. Women in the planned home-birth group were significantly less likely than those who planned a midwife-attended hospital birth to have obstetric interventions (e.g., electronic fetal monitoring, relative risk [RR] 0.32, 95% CI 0.29-0.36; assisted vaginal delivery, RR 0.41, 95% 0.33-0.52) or adverse maternal outcomes (e.g., third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.59; postpartum hemorrhage, RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). The findings were similar in the comparison with physician-assisted hospital births. Newborns in the home-birth group were less likely than those in the midwife-attended hospital-birth group to require resuscitation at birth (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.37) or oxygen therapy beyond 24 hours (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24-0.59). The findings were similar in the comparison with newborns in the physician-assisted hospital births; in addition, newborns in the home-birth group were less likely to have meconium aspiration (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.93) and more likely to be admitted to hospital or readmitted if born in hospital (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.85).
interpretationPlanned home birth attended by a registered midwife was associated with very low and comparable rates of perinatal death and reduced rates of obstetric interventions and other adverse perinatal outcomes compared with planned hospital birth attended by a midwife or physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.