ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009
The evolution of phototransduction and eyes.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Diversity: Extensive Variation in the Components of Complex Visual Systems across Animals.Cells · 2022Review
- Evolution of neuronal types and families.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- Common transcriptional mechanisms for visual photoreceptor cell differentiation among Pancrustaceans.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2012Review
- Photic niche invasions: phylogenetic history of the dim-light foraging augochlorine bees (Halictidae).Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2012Article
- Ectoplasm, ghost in the R cell machine?Developmental neurobiology · 2011Review
- Evolution of vertebrate retinal photoreception.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.