Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19719332›Full record

ReviewDrugs2009

Fixed-dose combinations as initial therapy for hypertension: a review of approved agents and a guide to patient selection.

Bernard Waeber, François Feihl, Luis M Ruilope

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03738761 (Fixed-Dose Combination of Perindopril/Amlodipine), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03738761 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Fixed-Dose Combination of Perindopril/Amlodipine (Amlessa®) and Fixed-Dose Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide /Amlodipine (Co-Amlessa®) - Contribution to Management in Newly Diagnosed and Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKRKARan2018 to 2019Enrolled471ConditionsHypertensionArmsAmlessa®, Co-Amlessa®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Detection and treatment of resistant hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2010
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernard WaeberDivision of Clinical Pathophysiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois et Université de Lausanne, MP 14/204 Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland. Bernard.Waeber@chuv.ch
François Feihl
Luis M Ruilope
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent guidelines recommend initiation of antihypertensive therapy with fixed-dose combinations in high-risk patients because such patients usually need two or more blood pressure (BP)-lowering agents in order to normalize their BP. Agents that block the renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists [angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs]) are preferred for the management of hypertension in most patients exhibiting subclinical target organ damage, or established cardiovascular or renal diseases. Unless contraindicated they should be one of the components of fixed-dose combinations, whereas the other component may be either a calcium channel antagonist or a thiazide diuretic. Fixed-dose combinations containing an ACE inhibitor or ARB plus a calcium channel antagonist appear particularly effective in preventing complications of coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

Drug CombinationsPatient SelectionAntihypertensive AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID19719332
OpenAlexW2015152272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.