Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19718354›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2009

Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Caroline S Verbeke, Krishna V Menon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03340844 (Role of Circulating Tumor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03340844 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Role of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC´s) Spread During Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Metastasis and Survival Rates in Patients With Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en SevillaRan2017 to 2023Enrolled86ConditionsPancreatic Tumor, Periampullary Carcinoma Resectable, Circulating Tumor Cells, MetastasisArmsNo Touch (NT), Superior Mesenteric Artery First (SMA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The clinical usefulness of optical coherence tomography during cancer interventions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pancreatic Cancer Frequently Infiltrates the TRIANGLE Compartment: A Surgical Option to Prevent Local Recurrence.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DNA Origami-Cyanine Nanocomplex for Precision Imaging of KRAS-Mutant Pancreatic Cancer Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline S VerbekeDepartment of Histopathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. Caroline.Verbeke@leedsth.nhs.uk
Krishna V Menon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curative resection is crucial to survival in pancreatic cancer; however, despite optimization and standardization of surgical procedures, this is not always achieved. This review highlights that the rates of microscopic margin involvement (R1) vary markedly between studies and, although resection margin status is believed to be a key prognostic factor, the rates of margin involvement and local tumour recurrence or overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients are often incongruent. Recent studies indicate that the discrepancy between margin status and clinical outcome is caused by frequent underreporting of microscopic margin involvement. Lack of standardization of pathological examination, confusing nomenclature and controversy regarding the definition of microscopic margin involvement have resulted in the wide variation of reported R1 rates that precludes meaningful comparison of data and clinicopathological correlation.

Indexed as

cancerpancreaspathologyresection margin

Identifiers

PMID19718354
PMCPMC2727080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.