Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19717347›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2009

Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.

Leo H Bonati, Jörg Ederle, Dominick J H McCabe, Joanna Dobson, Roland L Featherstone, Peter A Gaines, Jonathan D Beard, Graham S Venables, Hugh S Markus, Andrew Clifton and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Treatment of vertebral artery origin stenosis with a Pharos stent device: a single center experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2011
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Photon-counting detector CT angiography to evaluate carotid and subclavian artery stents and compared to ultrasound and angiography - an in-vivo study with spectral reconstructions.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Can Three-Dimensional T1-weighted MR Imaging Visualize the Vascular Lumen after Carotid Artery Stenting?Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Leo H BonatiStroke Research Group, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK.
Jörg Ederle
Dominick J H McCabe
Joanna Dobson
Roland L Featherstone
Peter A Gaines
Jonathan D Beard
Graham S Venables
Hugh S Markus
Andrew Clifton
Peter Sandercock
Martin M Brown
CAVATAS Investigators
University College London · GBNorthern General Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBTallaght University Hospital · IEWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council G0300411Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS), early recurrent carotid stenosis was more common in patients assigned to endovascular treatment than it was in patients assigned to endarterectomy (CEA), raising concerns about the long-term effectiveness of endovascular treatment. We aimed to investigate the long-term risks of restenosis in patients included in CAVATAS.

methods413 patients who were randomly assigned in CAVATAS and completed treatment for carotid stenosis (200 patients had endovascular treatment and 213 patients had endarterectomy) had prospective clinical follow-up at a median of 5 years and carotid duplex ultrasound at a median of 4 years. We investigated the cumulative long-term incidence of carotid restenosis after endovascular treatment and endarterectomy, the effect of the use of stents on restenosis after endovascular treatment, risk factors for the development of restenosis, and the effect of carotid restenosis on the risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN01425573.

findingsSevere carotid restenosis (>or=70%) or occlusion occurred significantly more often in patients in the endovascular arm than in patients in the endarterectomy arm (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.17, 95% CI 1.89-5.32; p<0.0001). The estimated 5-year incidence of restenosis was 30.7% in the endovascular arm and 10.5% in the endarterectomy arm. Patients in the endovascular arm who were treated with a stent (n=50) had a significantly lower risk of developing restenosis of 70% or greater compared with those treated with balloon angioplasty alone (n=145; HR 0.43, 0.19-0.97; p=0.04). Current smoking or a history of smoking was a predictor of restenosis of 70% or more (2.32, 1.19-4.54; p=0.01) and the early finding of moderate stenosis (50-69%) up to 60 days after treatment was associated with the risk of progression to restenosis of 70% or more (3.76, 1.88-7.52; p=0.0002). The composite endpoint of ipsilateral non-perioperative stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred more often in patients in whom restenosis of 70% or more was diagnosed in the first year after treatment compared with patients without restenosis of 70% or more (5-year incidence 23%vs 11%; HR 2.18, 1.04-4.54; p=0.04), but the increase in ipsilateral stroke alone was not significant (10%vs 5%; 1.67, 0.54-5.11).

interpretationRestenosis is about three times more common after endovascular treatment than after endarterectomy and is associated with recurrent ipsilateral cerebrovascular symptoms; however, the risk of recurrent ipsilateral stroke is low. Further data are required from on-going trials of stenting versus endarterectomy to ascertain whether long-term ultrasound follow-up is necessary after carotid revascularisation.

fundingBritish Heart Foundation; UK National Health Service Management Executive; UK Stroke Association.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryEndarterectomy, CarotidStentsAgedCarotid StenosisCoronary RestenosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleRisk FactorsStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19717347
PMCPMC2755038
OpenAlexW2097554249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.