Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19717340›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2009

Immune effector mechanisms against schistosomiasis: looking for a chink in the parasite's armour.

R Alan Wilson, Patricia S Coulson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Innate Immune Response to Helminth Infections.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. AdjuvantedFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immune Mechanisms Involved inFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R Alan WilsonDepartment of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373,York YO10 5YW, UK. raw3@york.ac.uk
Patricia S Coulson
University of York · GB

Funding

New Approaches to Schistosome vaccine antigen discoveryR01AI054711 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KING, CHRISTOPHER L · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNIAID NIH HHS AI54711-02NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI054711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recombinant antigen vaccine against Schistosoma mansoni remains elusive, in part because the parasite deploys complex defensive and offensive strategies to combat immune attack. Nevertheless, research on rodent and primate models has shown that schistosomes can be defeated when appropriate responses are elicited. Acquired protection appears to involve protracted inhibition of larval migration or key molecular processes at the adult surfaces, not rapid cytolytic killing mechanisms. A successful vaccine will likely require a cocktail of antigens rather than a single recombinant protein. In addition, ways need to be found of keeping the immune system on permanent alert, either to achieve adequate inhibition of protein function in adults, or because a trickle of incoming parasites does not amplify the secondary response.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsVaccinesAnimalsAntigens, HelminthHumansLarvaMacaca mulattaMiceSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniAntigens, HelminthVaccines

Identifiers

PMID19717340
PMCPMC3686490
OpenAlexW1991836853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.