Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19715693›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2009

Sphingosine-1-phosphate effects on the inner wall of Schlemm's canal and outflow facility in perfused human eyes.

W Daniel Stamer, A Thomas Read, Grant M Sumida, C Ross Ethier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mechanical stretch induces CaScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Aqueous Humor Outflow Requires Active Cellular Metabolism in Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Inflammatory Ocular Diseases and Sphingolipid Signaling.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

W Daniel StamerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, The University of Arizona, 655 North Alvernon Way, Suite 108, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA. dstamer@eyes.arizona.edu
A Thomas Read
Grant M Sumida
C Ross Ethier
University of Arizona · USImperial College London · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF MYOCILIN FUNCTION IN THE HUMAN EYER01EY012797 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI STAMER, W DANIEL · 2001 to 2010
$2.2M
CADHERIN DYNAMICS AND GLAUCOMAR01EY017007 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI STAMER, W DANIEL · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
CIHRNEI NIH HHS EY17007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012797NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work has shown that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) decreases outflow facility in perfused porcine eyes while dramatically increasing giant vacuole density in the inner wall of the aqueous plexus, with no obvious changes in the trabecular meshwork (TM). Due to known effects of S1P on cell-cell junction assembly in vascular endothelia, we hypothesized that S1P would decrease outflow facility in human eyes by increasing the complexity of cell-cell junctions in Schlemm's canal (SC) inner wall endothelia. Perfusion of enucleated post mortem human eyes at 8 mmHg constant pressure in the presence or absence of 5 microM S1P showed that S1P decreased outflow facility by 36 +/- 20% (n = 10 pairs; p = 0.0004); an effect likely mediated by activation of S1P(1) and/or S1P(3) receptor subtypes, which were found to be the principal S1P receptors expressed by both TM and SC cells by RT-PCR, confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and western blot analyses. Examination of SC's inner wall using confocal microscopy revealed no consistent differences in VE-cadherin, beta-catenin, phosphotyrosine or filamentous actin abundance/distribution between S1P-treated eyes and controls. Moreover, morphological inspection of conventional outflow tissues by light and scanning electron microscopy showed no significant differences between S1P-treated and control eyes, particularly in giant vacuole density. Thus, unlike the situation in porcine eyes, we did not observe changes in inner wall morphology in human eyes treated with S1P, despite a significant and immediate decrease in outflow facility in both species. Regardless, S1P receptor antagonists represent novel therapeutic prospects for ocular hypertension in humans.

Indexed as

ActinsAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior ChamberAntigens, CDAqueous HumorBlotting, WesternCadherin 5CadherinsCells, CulturedEye ProteinsFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureLysophospholipidsMaleActinsAntigens, CDCadherin 5CadherinsEye ProteinsLysophospholipidsReceptors, LysosphingolipidSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID19715693
PMCPMC2794662
OpenAlexW2012761013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.