ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2009
BigFoot: Bayesian alignment and phylogenetic footprinting with MCMC.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insertions and Deletions: Computational Methods, Evolutionary Dynamics, and Biological Applications.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Cytokinin Signaling ActivatesThe Plant cell · 2017Article
- GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- The inference of gene trees with species trees.Systematic biology · 2015Review
- Indel reliability in indel-based phylogenetic inference.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Simultaneous Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny under a joint model of protein sequence and structure.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Quantifying variances in comparative RNA secondary structure prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Phylogenetic footprinting: a boost for microbial regulatory genomics.Protoplasma · 2012Review
- Nonclassical regulation of transcription: interchromosomal interactions at the malic enzyme locus of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2011Article
- PSAR: measuring multiple sequence alignment reliability by probabilistic sampling.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- The construction and use of log-odds substitution scores for multiple sequence alignment.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies.Genome research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously combined statistical alignment and phylogenetic footprinting to detect conserved functional elements without assuming a fixed alignment. Considering a probability-weighted distribution of alignments removes sensitivity to alignment errors, properly accommodates regions of alignment uncertainty, and increases the accuracy of functional element prediction. Our method utilized standard dynamic programming hidden markov model algorithms to analyze up to four sequences.
resultsWe present a novel approach, implemented in the software package BigFoot, for performing phylogenetic footprinting on greater numbers of sequences. We have developed a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach which samples both sequence alignments and locations of slowly evolving regions. We implement our method as an extension of the existing StatAlign software package and test it on well-annotated regions controlling the expression of the even-skipped gene in Drosophila and the alpha-globin gene in vertebrates. The results exhibit how adding additional sequences to the analysis has the potential to improve the accuracy of functional predictions, and demonstrate how BigFoot outperforms existing alignment-based phylogenetic footprinting techniques.
conclusionBigFoot extends a combined alignment and phylogenetic footprinting approach to analyze larger amounts of sequence data using MCMC. Our approach is robust to alignment error and uncertainty and can be applied to a variety of biological datasets. The source code and documentation are publicly available for download from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~satija/BigFoot/
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.