Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19715442›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2009

Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution.

Feng Zhang, Wenli Gu, Matthew E Hurles, James R Lupski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 671 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
671citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

671 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

611 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feng ZhangDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Wenli Gu
Matthew E Hurles
James R Lupski

Funding

Nonrecurrent rearrangements, genome architecture and neurodegenerative disease.R01NS058529 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2009 to 2017
$5.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058529Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) is a source of genetic diversity in humans. Numerous CNVs are being identified with various genome analysis platforms, including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms, and next-generation sequencing. CNV formation occurs by both recombination-based and replication-based mechanisms and de novo locus-specific mutation rates appear much higher for CNVs than for SNPs. By various molecular mechanisms, including gene dosage, gene disruption, gene fusion, position effects, etc., CNVs can cause Mendelian or sporadic traits, or be associated with complex diseases. However, CNV can also represent benign polymorphic variants. CNVs, especially gene duplication and exon shuffling, can be a predominant mechanism driving gene and genome evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DosagePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsComparative Genomic HybridizationDiseaseDNADNA ReplicationHumansDNA

Identifiers

PMID19715442
PMCPMC4472309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.