ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2010
Mold and human health: separating the wheat from the chaff.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Utilization ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Housing instability and cardiometabolic health in the United States: a narrative review of the literature.BMC public health · 2023Review
- Differential effects of exposure to toxic or nontoxic mold spores on brain inflammation and Morris water maze performance.Behavioural brain research · 2023Article
- Article
- Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in a Housewife Exposed to Aspergillus flavus in Poor Living Conditions: A Case Report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Fungal disease of the nose and sinuses: an updated overview.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2013Review
- The practical understanding and treatment of asthma.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012Article
- Exposure and Health Effects of Fungi on Humans.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The term "mold" is utilized to define the ubiquitous fungal species commonly found in household dust and observed as visible multicellular filaments. Several well-defined human diseases are known to be caused or exacerbated by mold or by exposure to their byproducts. Among these, a solid connection has been established with infections, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and asthma. In the past decades, other less-defined and generally false conditions have also been ascribed to mold. We will herein review and critically discuss the available evidence on the influence of mold on human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19714500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.