Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19714386›Full record

ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2009

Integration of psychological researches under the scheme of subjectivity.

Xiaowen Li

Abstract readCommentReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The ways of 'being' and 'becoming' human.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2009
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiaowen LiSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. xwli@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of meaning gradually catches psychologists' attention and is increasingly becoming a focus of study in contemporary psychology. Elstrup's (2009) research about social evolution gives a reasonable angle on meaning study, which is in accordance with the nature of both human and personal psychological evolution and allows us to see subjectivity and dynamics of psychological phenomena through the focus of the subject-object relation. A phylogenetic system of explanation based on subject-object relation will be able to integrate new psychological research directions. This means that we should see psychological phenomena as historic and the research methods of cultural ecology as absolutely necessary.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHumansPsychologyPsychology, SocialResearch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.