Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19714263›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2009

Massive choroidal hemorrhage after intravitreal administration of bevacizumab (Avastin) for AMD followed by controlateral sympathetic ophthalmia.

Dimitrios Brouzas, Chryssanthi Koutsandrea, Marilita Moschos, Spiros Papadimitriou, Ioannis Ladas, Michael Apostolopoulos

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. An atypical presentation of sympathetic ophthalmia following chemical ocular burns.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitrios Brouzas1st Eye Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
Marilita Moschos
Spiros Papadimitriou
Ioannis Ladas
Michael Apostolopoulos
Athens Eye Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report a severe ocular complication initiated ten days after intravitreal administration of bevacizumab (Avastin((R))), in a patient with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PATIENTS AND

methodCase report.

resultsTen days after intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg Avastin((R)), the patient manifested acute loss of vision with excruciating pain. An extensive choroidal detachment was evident in close contact with the lens, which necessitated an emergency sclerotomy with reconstruction of the anterior chamber. Four months later, the eye proceeded to phthisis bulbi. Five months after the injection, the patient complained of mild pain, photophobia, and visual acuity deterioration from the fellow eye. The diagnosis of sympathetic ophthalmia was suggested and treated with intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide every three months with good response, complicated by elevation of intraocular pressure which we managed with Ahmet valve implantation.

conclusionSerious ocular complications after intravitreal of Avastin((R)) can not be excluded, including massive choroidal hemorrhage and sympathetic ophthalmia of the fellow eye.

Indexed as

Avastin® complicationchoroidal detachmentintravitreal injectionPhthisis bulbisympathetic ophthalmia

Identifiers

PMID19714263
PMCPMC2732055
OpenAlexW2163423192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.