ArticlePloS one2009
Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Surviving Twin after Single Fetal Demise at 17 Weeks: A Case Report.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
- Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the risk of cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Association between birthweight discordance and extrauterine growth restriction among preterm twins: a national multi-center study in China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Developmental trajectories of late preterm infants and predictors of academic performance.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Perinatal Outcomes and Neurodevelopment 1 Year after Birth in Discordant Twins According to Chorionicity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- To be born twin: effects on long-term neurodevelopment of very preterm infants-a cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm twins at 5 years of age.Pediatric research · 2020Article
- Long-Term Outcome of Monochorionic Twins after Fetoscopic Laser Therapy Compared to Matched Dichorionic Twins.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2020Article
- Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes between monochorionic and dichorionic twins with birth weight ≤ 1500 g in Japan: a register-based cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018Article
- The complex aetiology of cerebral palsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2018Review
- Developmental and behavioral outcomes of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins born in the third trimester.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Article
- Association of Superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2) Genotype with Gray Matter Volume Shrinkage in Chronic Alcohol Users: Replication and Further Evaluation of an Addiction Gene Panel.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2016Article
- The Prenatal Environment in Twin Studies: A Review on Chorionicity.Behavior genetics · 2016Review
- Neuro-developmental outcome of a large cohort of growth discordant twins.European journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonochorionic (MC) twins are at increased risk for perinatal mortality and serious morbidity due to the presence of placental vascular anastomoses. Cerebral injury can be secondary to haemodynamic and hematological disorders during pregnancy (especially twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) or intrauterine co-twin death) or from postnatal injury associated with prematurity and low birth weight, common complications in twin pregnancies. We investigated neurodevelopmental outcome in MC and dichorionic (DC) twins at the age of two years.
methodsThis was a prospective cohort study. Cerebral palsy (CP) was studied in 182 MC infants and 189 DC infants matched for weight and age at delivery, gender, ethnicity of the mother and study center. After losses to follow-up, 282 of the 366 infants without CP were available to be tested with the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales at 22 months corrected age, all born between January 2005 and January 2006 in nine perinatal centers in The Netherlands. Due to phenotypic (un)alikeness in mono-or dizygosity, the principal investigator was not blinded to chorionic status; perinatal outcome, with exception of co-twin death, was not known to the examiner.
findingsFour out of 182 MC infants had CP (2.2%) - two of the four CP-cases were due to complications specific to MC twin pregnancies (TTTS and co-twin death) and the other two cases of CP were the result of cystic PVL after preterm birth - compared to one sibling of a DC twin (0.5%; OR 4.2, 95% CI 0.5-38.2) of unknown origin. Follow-up rate of neurodevelopmental outcome by Griffith's test was 76%. The majority of 2-year-old twins had normal developmental status. There were no significant differences between MC and DC twins. One MC infant (0.7%) had a developmental delay compared to 6 DC infants (4.2%; OR 0.2, 95% 0.0-1.4). Birth weight discordancy did not influence long-term outcome, though the smaller twin had slightly lower developmental scores than its larger co-twin.
conclusionsThere were no significant differences in occurrence of cerebral palsy as well as neurodevelopmental outcome between MC and DC twins. Outcome of MC twins seems favourable in the absence of TTTS or co-twin death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.